How to beat criminal charges in admiralty courts
| saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/25/19 | | fragrant knife | 03/25/19 | | saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/25/19 | | fragrant knife | 03/25/19 | | saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/25/19 | | saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/25/19 | | saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/25/19 | | harsh church indirect expression | 03/26/19 | | saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/26/19 | | saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/26/19 | | Crusty alpha location | 03/26/19 | | saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/26/19 | | Crusty alpha location | 03/26/19 | | saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king | 03/26/19 | | sooty field idea he suggested | 03/26/19 | | galvanic roast beef native | 03/26/19 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 25th, 2019 4:53 PM Author: saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king
I would love to write this in a motion: "WHEREFORE, for the foregoing, John Henry Doe, a free natural born sentient human being, with no attachments to government, respectfully demands that the original complaint be dismissed, and the cross-libel timely proceed against these "criminal elements in government." John Henry Doe seeks $100,000.00 in damages, $100,000.00 in compensatory damages, and $100,000.00 in punitive damages per person and any and all additional and just action that this court deems appropriate."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228851&forum_id=2#37988575) |
Date: March 25th, 2019 4:57 PM Author: saffron narrow-minded garrison philosopher-king
Holy shit, this guy does *not* like attorneys: "Who profits from "DANGEROUS, DISINGENUOUS, DOMESTIC TERRORISTS" posing as "Peace Officers" in a "quid pro quo" relationship while showing contempt for the law, the Constitution they pledged an Oath to know, preserve, uphold & enforce? ATTORNEYS"
https://freedom-school.com/travel/would-you-hire-pay-a-bartender-that-cannot-mix-a-drink.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228851&forum_id=2#37988597) |
Date: March 26th, 2019 1:18 AM Author: harsh church indirect expression
This all leads to different aspects of admiralty/maritime law, both inside and outside the courtroom. The carriage of goods act, Title 46, is all governed by the Secretary of Transportation--the Coast Guard, Secretary of Commerce and the treasury are all under Secretary of Transportation and it's all in commerce. The Secretary of transportation is the head of the maritime commission. All vessels are registered under Title 46, Section 31-301 which talks about maritime liens that arise by operation of law. There's a maritime lien commission. The Secretary of Transportation is running everything because we are all on the 'highway of commerce'--the water came inland, so to speak, and now it's here under the law of trust. Everyone who comes into the courtroom is a ward in admiralty--a ward of the court. We're in an "in rem" proceeding in admiralty in a title dispute and we have to come in as the title holder or have interest or claim in the subject matter of the complaint, or we are the 'vessel' and they have arrested 'the vessel.'
We're not in common law in the courts, we're in admiralty and they get jurisdiction by arresting the vessel. They (lawyers/district attorneys/law enforcement) don't use the proper process and they need to trick, cajole, deceive, pressure us to do whatever they need to do and have us make a mistake to give them 'in personam jurisdiction' over us when we take on the attributes of a general appearance to the subject matter of the pleadings against the defendant "in rem" and we start acting in any capacity on the merits of the charges or by taking on the persona of the defendant vessel 'in rem.' There's lots more to this, but I think you get the gist about 'prisons for profit.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4228851&forum_id=2#37991526) |
|
|