Date: April 2nd, 2019 11:53 PM Author: Sexy alpha electric furnace
Yes, incredibly 180. The major argument against it is that it could cause a rise in bad-faith claims that trial lawyers aggressively pursue. To the critics, seeking policy limits after a fender-bender is a bad-faith claim. To people like CSLG, it's a way to print money.
Date: June 2nd, 2020 3:08 AM Author: razzle-dazzle new version
Im in a state that makes you opt out of PIP in writing, so I suspect many drivers have it included on their on their policies unknowingly. Has this decimated the shitlaw soft tissue case industry? I feel like many of CSLG’s auto cases settle for what would covered under PIP. No need for lawyer in this scenario.