The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
🚨 FANI DISQUALIFIED FROM TRUMP GA ELECTION CASE 🚨
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:10 AM Author: deranged house lolol libs lolol
https://x.com/msnbc/status/1768623398790316184?s=46&t=jKXH7m3p0jeKr--GrDZGug |
 |
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:19 AM Author: Curious light roommate lol
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna139810 |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:20 AM Author: Racy Brilliant Wrinkle wow more misleading jewish shitpoasts. great job you mentally retarded TDS suffering internet addicted jewish pedophile (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496000) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:27 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown u mad trumpkins? the inarticulate 85iq sheboon that thoroughly embarrassed and discredited herself before the case even began can remain on! they *only* have to dismiss the prosecutor she lied about having a relationship with and paid off with cash she has no accounting for!
heh, fucking trumpkins blown the fuck out once again!! |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:28 AM Author: deranged house too bad, since Wade seemed like such an experienced and talented prosecutor, especially with RICO cases (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496018) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:47 AM Author: Racy Brilliant Wrinkle the whole thing is a sham so having these clowns involved would be the perfect outcome for libs you mentally retarded jewish pedophile. there is no actual crime or any notion that this is a real trial of any sorts other than simple political persecution. problem is that blacks aren't even competent enough to tap dance through the motions of the whole scam to get their piece. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496058) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:57 AM Author: Stimulating stage (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496090) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:08 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496122) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:38 AM Author: odious lay lmao, that dude got thrown off?
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:24 AM Author: odious lay this seemed to be inevitable based on the judge's dismissal of a handful of counts yesterday. no reason he would have done that if he was about to DQ the prosecutor.
cons were pissing and shitting themselves with glee about how the dismissal was a horrible development for the state, etc. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:56 AM Author: Cerebral Bearded Lettuce I dunno. This sets up a huge shitstorm when Fani refuses to resign her office from the case or to fire Wade.
The order literally said there was an appearance of impropriety and that they lied about their relationship
Going to be 1800000 to see what this bitch decides to do (my local county DA by the way) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:57 AM Author: Soul-stirring shrine gaming laptop Don't you think she'll just fire Wade and proceed with the case? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496087) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:59 AM Author: deranged house Yes. And new prosecutor will have a head start because they’ve already interviewed all the witnesses and assembled all the evidence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496093) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:05 AM Author: Racy Brilliant Wrinkle the whole thing is a sham so having these clowns involved would be the perfect outcome for libs you mentally retarded jewish pedophile. there is no actual crime or any notion that this is a real trial of any sorts other than simple political persecution. problem is that blacks aren't even competent enough to tap dance through the motions of the whole scam to get their piece. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496109) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:59 AM Author: Cerebral Bearded Lettuce yes for sure. but the "appearance of impropriety" wording in the order will open up a huge can of appeal grounds, no? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496096) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:09 AM Author: deranged house no, because they’re alleviating any potential conflict by bouncing the special prosecutor. how can there be a conflict or the appearance of one when he isn’t even on the case? The remedy for something like this isn’t to dismiss the indictment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496128) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:16 AM Author: odious lay i disagree. haen't read yet, but didn't the judge find that he had to conclude that there was an actual conflict and not the appearance of one, in order to DQ?
i remember from the closing arguments that this is an open question in GA case law. if it ultimately is the case that an appearance of a conflict is enough, then a guilty finding could get tossed on appeal.
i doubt there is any way that Ds can appeal now, though.
|
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:21 AM Author: deranged house How can there be an appearance of a conflict if Wade isn’t even on the case? Where is the conflict? You don’t let criminal go free over something like this. You cure the conflict. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496172) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:33 AM Author: odious lay so you're saying that if the GA scotus ultimately finds that as a matter of law the judge was mistaken here and that an appearance of conflict should have resulted in her DQ, they will say "well, fuck it. he should have DQed her office, but they got rid of the wade guy" and let it stand?
not a crimbro, but this doesn't seem right to me. wouldn't they hold that the judge erred and vacate the convictions and remand to the state to determine what to do with the case (i.e., have it tried by someone other than the fulton county DA office)? |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:44 AM Author: deranged house you’re basically arguing “But what if the COA DOES say there was a conflict? How is it not a conflict?” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496241) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:49 AM Author: odious lay wtf are you talking about? that is not what i'm saying. is this spaceporn?
i am assuming (i am going only on news reports as i haven't read the decision and doubt that i will) that the judge concluded that appearance of a conflict is not sufficient for DQ, which is an open question under GA case law. although he found the appearance of a conflict, he let her office remain on the case. if he had reached a different legal conclusion, her office would be removed from the case to be either reassigned to a different prosecutor's office in the state, or withdrawn altogether.
i'd expect that if GA scotus finds that the judge committed legal error here (on the ground that appearance of conflict is enough), the entire proceeding is void and no convictions resulting from it can stand. i don't see how they'd conclude that the judge should have removed willis's entire office from the case, but it's nbd because they removed wade and that's good enough. put another way, if the appearance of conflict is enough for DQ, then removing wade after the fact doesn't seem to cure that.
what you are saying is that there is no remedy for this if the GA supreme court disagrees with him and holds that the appearance of a conflict is enough. that doesn't seem right. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 2:17 PM Author: Carnelian Space you are correct. the judge found there was appearance of a conflict but not an actual conflict. if there was an actual conflict, its an automatic dq. his decision holds here that appearance of a conflict is not an automatic dq and that alternative remedies may be used to address the situation, such as removing wade in this case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496872) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 2:26 PM Author: odious lay so assuming the GA scotus disgrees with him and holds that he should have DQed willis's office, what do you think the remedy, if any, is? Assume Ds cannot pursue an interlocutory appeal and this is after the trial. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496889) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 3:15 PM Author: Carnelian Space i think the remedy would be a new trial. i also think that ga scotus would be very reluctant to reach a ruling which granted a new trial to a convicted defendant on this basis so would take great pains not to reverse. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47497132) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:08 AM Author: odious lay so he effectively found that she committed perjury?
she has to be shitting herself, as well as wade and the friend whose name i can't remember who "didn't recall" a single thing on the stand. there is a pretty decent chance they all get disbarred over this. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:24 AM Author: cyan supple toilet seat hell Con here. But I went to law school so I'm not stupid enough to think this is the least bit good for libs. Inevitable, sure. But it was always inevitable that libs would fail here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496189) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:02 AM Author: deranged house So basically Trumpmos got a guy they said was incompetent to prosecute a RICO case bounced from the case lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496102) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:05 AM Author: Bossy Corner but libs said he was eminently qualified, so they must be mad too, right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496111) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:07 AM Author: deranged house I don’t think he was very qualified do you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496116) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:46 AM Author: Bossy Corner why aren’t libs sending their best? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496249) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:06 AM Author: Racy Brilliant Wrinkle you are a mentally retarded jewish pedophile and it doesn't matter how competent the nig is or isn't at 'RICO' because this isn't a RICO case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496113) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:11 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown the "heads i win, tails you lose" mind of a shitlib is stunning. even when something thoroughly embarrassing like this happens they still find a way to chalk it up as a win. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496133) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:13 AM Author: deranged house we’re still going to trial in august, faggot. Trump was trying to get the indictment dismissed, which would have been the only positive outcome for him, and which he failed to do. And I would be shocked if the new prosecutor is worse than the old one. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496144) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:24 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown are you a lawyer? of course his lawyers are going to exhaust every possible out. i "try" to dismiss every complaint filed against my clients even if it's meritorious and my motion will almost surely be denied.
if you think this willis thing is anything but a huge fucking embarrassment for the democrats you're delusional. yeah, it's not outcome determinative. but it makes you guys look incompetent at best and corrupt at worst. the whole point of this prosecution was to make trump look bad, and, once again, it's backfired, and this is all reflected in polling. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:25 AM Author: cyan supple toilet seat hell None of the libs ITT are lawyers. You can smell it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496192) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:27 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown trump's lawyers filed a doomed motion to dismiss an indictment, something every competent criminal defense attorney would do in a case of this magnitude, and failed. fucking trump never not losing lol. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496194) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:30 AM Author: deranged house nobody cares if it’s an embarrassment if trump still ends up convicted and jailed, and this doesn’t impact that (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496199) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:37 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown lol, confirmed non-lawyer.
if you think there's a scintilla of a chance that a state court is going to convict and imprison and major party candidate in a trial set to begin 3 months before an election, you are delusional. do you know how the sentencing phase, appellate process, and the time between conviction and actually going to jail works? of course not, you're just jerking off and living in a fantasy world.
even in the very edge case scenario where the prosecution convicts trump before the election, it is literally impossible for him to be sentenced in incarcerated by the election. that's just not how it works. certainly not for a fucking major party candidate who is dominating the polls. you're stupid or crazy. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:47 AM Author: deranged house he’ll be sentenced before Inauguration Day though. and these are state-level charges. He can’t pardon himself and SCOTUS can’t tell GA to let him go any more than they could tell Canada to let him go. Kemp would probably cuck and pardon him though. Trump’s bigger problem is in NY, where he will be convicted in the next three weeks and jailed on 34 felony counts before the election. No one is going to pardon him in that case.
Edit: just remembered, kemp can’t pardon him. In GA pardons go before a state commission. Sorry Trumpmo. He’ll have to face Justice like anyone else. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:52 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown if you think a state is going is going to be able to incarcerate the fucking president-elect you are fucking insane.
if trump loses he's just citizen trump. but if he wins he will not be going to fucking prison, you literal moron. you think scotus is going to be like "oh yeah, totally fine that every state has the independent authority to imprison the president-elect." you probably thought the colorado ballot case was going to go your way too.
don't you see how fucking stupid this would be? like, aside from trump, just as a policy? just do let wyoming make it a felony to be named "joe biden" and send him to jail. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:54 AM Author: puce native he spammed the bort for weeks about the Colorado case and how Trump was gonna be removed from the ballot lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496281) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:05 AM Author: deranged house nope I told you the morning of that Trump would win the ballot case 9-0 but he will lose the immunity case 8-1 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496353) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:04 AM Author: deranged house you act like the governor of some random state can just choose to imprison a presidential candidate they don’t like for no reason. that’s not what’s happening here. file bogus charges and they’ll get dismissed on constitutional grounds. we’re talking about a unanimous jury finding guilt here. you can’t just manufacture something like that despite your best efforts to convince people that is what is happening. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496347) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:11 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown try to untether yourself from making this about trump for a moment. do you think scotus is going to allow a state to imprison a president-elect? even if a president-elect is dead to rights guilty of a state felony, they are not going to allow individual states to imprison the president-elect. we have a process for removing the president from power. that cannot be superseded by a state. this is exactly like the colorado ballot access case. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496369) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:14 AM Author: deranged house The remedy for something like this is the 25th amendment. Vice President is an elected position for this very reason. And in any event he’ll be in jail before he’s ever president-elect. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496374) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:46 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown that's not the remedy, it's the consequence of what happens if the president is removed. the remedy is impeachment you dolt. implicit in impeachment being in the constitution is that this is the sole way of removing a president from power. states are not going to be granted ANY independent authority to remove a president from power. the consequences of this are obvious to everyone. you would agree if you didn't have terminal TDS and could separate policy decisions from your desire to make sure trump isn't potus. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496450) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 2:36 PM Author: deranged house It’s no different than if he got arrested and jailed in Canada. he’s unavailable to serve, 25th amendment would be invoked, and VP would become POTUS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496941) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 3:06 PM Author: misunderstood shaky clown SCOTUS doesn't have authority over canada. SCOTUS does have authority over states is a variety of ways. states do not possess the power to do everything. see e.g. the colorado ballot access decision.
scotus compels states to do shit all the time. the constitution is the supreme law of the land. scoutus would only surely decide that the impeachment provisions in the constitution are the sole way of removing a president from power, and that any state action to the contrary is unconstitutional. for obvious reasons.
like, how can you say "herp derp it's just like candada" after scotus JUST compelled a state to do something regarding the president. and opinion talked at length at how insane it would be for every state to independently determine whether a candidate is qualified. this would go even beyond that. clinton v. jones already established immunity for criminal on civil suits while in office. the same rational could easily be extended to the president-elect. and, as a practical matter, how tf is georgia gonna force president-elect trump to report to prison anyway? send georgia police to dc to arrest him before he's inaugurated?
this is all such retarded bullshit. i would say you're flaming, but you delusional tds fags have proven you exist beyond rational thinking. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:13 AM Author: Racy Brilliant Wrinkle "you act like the governor of some random state can just choose to imprison a presidential candidate they don’t like for no reason."
that is exactly what is happening here you mentally retarded jewish pedophile |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:16 AM Author: deranged house ^see gunnerat I told you that’s what your people are arguing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496381) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 11:50 AM Author: misunderstood shaky clown it's beside the point anyone. a president-elect could be dead to rights to a state felony, it doesn't mater. states are not going to be granted ANY independent power to remove a president. incarcerating him is removal. hypothetically, if a president was IN JAIL and got elected, he would be allowed to leave, serve, and return. the qualifications for president are in the constitution. the process for removing a president are in the constitution. they purposefully did not include "not a felon" for this very reason. if the people choose to elect a felon that is their right.
i don't know why these fucking libs are so gung-ho to destroy democracy, you know, the thing that they constantly accuse trump of. let the people make their choice. if they want to elect trump despite everything, they should be able to. that's democracy. they're trying everything they can to keep him out of office beyond, you know, putting up a candidate that would beat him. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:15 AM Author: Red floppy theater roast beef They will never prosecute Trump now! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496158) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:20 AM Author: Stimulating stage Lol how is this a win for libs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496171) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:22 AM Author: cyan supple toilet seat hell (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496181) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:21 AM Author: cyan supple toilet seat hell OP actually thinks this is bad for Trump. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496173) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:29 AM Author: deranged house He got a shitty prosecutor bounced from the case. trial still proceeds in august. doesn’t seem like great news for Trump. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496198) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:46 AM Author: Racy Brilliant Wrinkle you are mentally retarded (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496247) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 9:34 PM Author: arrogant dead regret dysfunction (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47498288) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:36 AM Author: deranged house Trumpmos actually seem pretty happy with this outcome
https://x.com/ronfilipkowski/status/1768642311959790062?s=46&t=jKXH7m3p0jeKr--GrDZGug
https://www.meidastouch.com/news/maga-melts-down-over-fani-willis-ruling |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:54 AM Author: odious lay lmao at MTG's face in that pic. she is a stupid nutbag (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496279) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 10:54 AM Author: Carnelian Space so what's the chance mcafee allows them to make an interlocutory appeal? his ruling dismissing the six charges earlier this week explicitly said he would grant a certificate of appeal for that but this one is silent (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496282) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 12:49 PM Author: odious lay my prediction yesterday was that he would not disqualify but would certify the issue for immediate appeal, as he did with the counts he tossed. since he was silent, id guess he would not permit appeal. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496636) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 1:38 PM Author: Red floppy theater roast beef It might be immediately appealable regardless of what the judge says. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47496764) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 2:06 PM Author: odious lay not sure how any of this works but obvs the Ds are going to try to appeal it right away.
i think it should be appealable now. we;ll see what unfolds! |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 2:26 PM Author: Galvanic Smoky Headpube Puppy I come here mainly for the keen legal analyses and insights offered by CandyRidetp.
The crazy thing is that he doles these out FOR FREE. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 3:15 PM Author: misunderstood shaky clown one weird trick: if a judge denies your interlocutory appeal you just fucking do it anyway (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47497133) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 6:22 PM Author: Red floppy theater roast beef In my state, if you try to disqualify a lawyer and lose you can immediately appeal. Who knows what the deal is in Georgia. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47497778) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 3:11 PM Author: puce native Candy Ride tp is a moron (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5504551&forum_id=2#47497108) |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 2:06 PM Author: filthy gas station I think McAfee would allow an interlocutory appeal, but Willis et al. don't want to further delay trial.
McAfee was probably influenced by the late political challenge in his election. Pretty tepid opinion. |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 2:04 PM Author: tripping hospital toaster Interesting video from 2020:
https://cdn.videy.co/YsQHjfY0.mp4 |
|
Date: March 15th, 2024 3:35 PM Author: Idiotic mind-boggling area wagecucks You read the opinion and then see the judge would have allowed Wade to stay on the case. jfc. Good enough for Georgia, I guess.
I hope there is an option for an appeal or at least a writ. The appellate judges should read McAfee's opinion and say "if that's not good enough to bump a prosecutor in Georgia then we are all fucked. Reversed." |