A ‘deeply misguided’ political belief is weakening the economy, says Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo

PUBLISHED THU, APR 18 20244:25 PM EDTUPDATED 22 MIN AGO

thumbnail

Eric Rosenbaum

@ERPROSE

WATCH LIVE

KEY POINTS

Gina Raimondo, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, pushed for CHIPS Act funding for semiconductor plants to be tied to plans from CEOs to provide employees access to child-care services.

Raimondo said at CNBC’s inaugural Changemakers Summit on Thursday in New York that any person, politician, CEO or otherwise, who says child-care policy is social policy is “deeply misguided.”

Jessica Chang, founder and CEO of Upwards, which provides access to child-care benefits and services to Amazon, the U.S. Army and other corporate and government clients, pointed in a separate Changemakers’ session to a recent Boston Consulting Group study that reports the return on investment from child care has been measured at between 90% and 425%.

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 25: U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo listens as U.S. President Joe Biden participates virtually in a meeting on the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) for America Act, in the South Court Auditorium at the White House on July 25, 2022 in Washington, DC. The meeting was held for President Biden to hear from CEOs and labor leaders on the way funding for production of computer chips would impact them. The meeting was also attended by U.S. Secretary of Com

WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 25: U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo listens as U.S. President Joe Biden participates virtually in a meeting on the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors (CHIPS) for America Act, in the South Court Auditorium at the White House on July 25, 2022 in Washington, DC.

Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images News | Getty Images

On Monday, when U.S. Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo was in Texas to tour a new Samsung semiconductor plant being built with financial support from the CHIPS Act, the CEO of the South Korean conglomerate’s chip division pulled the Commerce Secretary aside to show her where the building would be that houses on-campus child care and an on-campus job training center.

Recalling the encounter in an interview with CNBC’s Sara Eisen at CNBC’s inaugural Changemakers Summit in New York City on Thursday, Raimondo said the Samsung executive added, “That’s what we do in Korea, and we know its works, and of course we will do it here.”

The interaction had a back story. The U.S. government tied CHIPs Act funding, worth billions to companies, to plans to provide access to child-care services to employees. That didn’t go over well with all lawmakers.

“Certain politicians on Capitol Hill didn’t like my stance, but folks running these companies who know they need top talent understand,” she said. “Anyone who thinks child care is social policy is deeply misguided and doesn’t know how to run a business,” added Raimondo, who was named to CNBC’s first Changemakers list earlier this year.

Raimondo, who was a lawyer early in her career before rising to general partner at a venture capital firm and finally to Rhode Island governor — and who has two teenage children now — said offering access to affordable high-quality child care doesn’t mean a company has to provide it on site, but it does mean that just like companies provide healthcare and paid leave and make investments in programs like continuing education, child care needs to be a core benefit.

“I was not prescribing a way for them to do it. What we were saying is if you want taxpayer money you must prove to us you’ll be successful,” Raimondo said, adding that companies won’t be successful without finding and retaining the best talent. “Child care is core to enabling women to work,” she said.

Commerce Sec. Raimondo on Samsung award: Goal is to make 20% of the world's semiconductorsWATCH NOW

VIDEO04:36

Commerce Sec. Raimondo on Samsung award: Goal is to make 20% of the world’s semiconductors

It is also proven in economic terms, according to Jessica Chang, co-founder & CEO of child-care services provider Upwards, which provides access to child-care benefits and services to Amazon, the U.S. Army and other corporate and government clients. During a separate session at CNBC Changemakers, she pointed to a recent study from the Boston Consulting Group that measured the return on investment from child-care access at between 90% and 425%. The same study found that retaining as few as 1% of eligible employees because of child-care benefits — Chang said she had to leave a job when she first became a mother — can cover the cost of offering them to the total employee population.

“What they don’t tell you when you decide to start a family is it should be the happiest day of your life but for women you’re given a choice: you can have a career or family. I was put to that choice, and the choice wasn’t mine to make. It was society’s,” Chang said in the Changemakers interview with CNBC’s Julia Boorstin. She explained that if she stayed in her career, her entire post-tax pay would have gone to child care, and all of the child care providers in her area were waitlisted. Even if she could find a spot, “I could go back to work and not spend time with my child and also not add to my family [finances].”

“Enough is enough. We’ve got to solve this now,” said Chang, who was named to CNBC’s first Changemakers list earlier this year. Chang recalled that when she was fundraising for her startup, she was sitting in a final meeting with a whole partner group, “and a male partner came in and said, ‘I don’t understand ... is this a real issue? I didn’t really go through this, so how many people are really thinking child care is an issue? And why are you calling it a crisis?’ ... If I could do it again, I would say I should have just walked out of the room.”

There is also a history of research endorsed by the business community showing that it’s not just women in the workforce but the early education of the next generation of workers that is at stake, including a 2019 study from the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the largest business trade group.

“The business community really has to raise its voice and echo it’s not social policy, it’s economic policy,” said Raimondo, who is overseeing a Commerce Department budget that has ballooned from a historical average of $10 billion to $150 billion. “If you want a strong economy, women have to participate and in order for that to happen, we need strong child care,” she said. “Companies need to have more women in top jobs and the only way to get there is to help them get there, and child care is a key piece of the puzzle.”

Raimondo noted that half of Americans live in a “child care desert,” with not enough services available at a cost that is affordable.

“I’m trying to raise my voice that this is a commercial issue, not just a women’s issue or social issue,” said Raimondo, who will host a Commerce Department child care summit in June.

MORE IN CNBC CHANGEMAKERS

These are the 2024 CNBC Changemakers: See the full list of women transforming business

These are the 2024 CNBC Changemakers: See the full list of women transforming business

CNBC.com staff

Caitlin Clark salary criticism a 'false narrative,' says WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert

Caitlin Clark salary criticism a ‘false narrative,’ says WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert

Ian Thomas

WATCH NOW

Caitlin Clark helping drive WNBA to 'higher heights' financially, says Commissioner Cathy Engelbert

WATCH NOW

VIDEO04:26

Caitlin Clark helping drive WNBA to ‘higher heights’ financially, says Commissioner Cathy Engelbert

READ MORE

CNBC logo

Subscribe to CNBC PRO

Subscribe to Investing Club

Licensing & Reprints

CNBC Councils

Supply Chain Values

CNBC on Peacock

Join the CNBC Panel

Digital Products

News Releases

Closed Captioning

Corrections

About CNBC

Internships

Site Map

Ad Choices

Careers

Help

Contact

News Tips

Got a confidential news tip? We want to hear from you.

GET IN TOUCH

CNBC Newsletters

Sign up for free newsletters and get more CNBC delivered to your inbox

SIGN UP NOW

Get this delivered to your inbox, and more info about our products and services.

Advertise With Us

PLEASE CONTACT US

Privacy Policy

CA Notice

Terms of Service

© 2024 CNBC LLC. All Rights Reserved.

A Division of NBCUniversal

Data is a real-time snapshot *Data is delayed at least 15 minutes. Global Business and Financial News, Stock Quotes, and Market Data and Analysis.

Market Data Terms of Use and Disclaimers

Data also provided by

Reuters logo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47594868)

I was not prescribing a way for them to do it. What we were saying is if you want taxpayer money you must prove to us you’ll be successful,” Raimondo said, adding that companies won’t be successful without finding and retaining the best talent. “Child care is core to enabling women to work,” she said.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47594872)

Reminder, this is what they indoctrinate children with on birthright: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7iSrGQ1cwxM

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47598428)

these ppl shld all be put in camps and gassed, jfc at birdshit "men" for even letting shit get to this point. ghastly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47594951)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47595258)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47595466)

Guess what - there is a huge shortage of quality childcare. White collar families in NYC, BOS, DC, SF, etc. have to pay $3K per month for a 6 month old, $2.5K for a 1 year old, and $2K for a 3 year old. It's like $100K easy to get a kid from birth to starting kindergarten, and then you need after care because kindergarten isn't all day.

In a normal country, the government isn't giving BILLIONS of dollars to public companies to build factories. If they are going to do that, they may as well impose conditions that help local people. And guess what you FOREVERALONE moron: even if the employees were 100% male, they can still use the daycares for their children. (What that fuck does it matter if only 1% of chip makers are female? access to daycare is a family benefit.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47596038)

Lol wtf this doesn’t exist in America anymore

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47596720)

But that's exactly what China seems to be doing and it seems to be working idk

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47596755)

We don’t need chips where we’re going

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47595070)

All you’ll ever be

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47596209)

I love the logic here. We put the mandate into the bill because the folks running the companies know it's necessary to retain the top talent!!! Okay, then why do you need the mandate, they're going to do it anyway.

To the extent companies do offer this benefit: I wonder about the legalities, by the way, of simply hiring your SAHW to be your childcare provider. Might be worth the paperwork headache if the company will cut your wife a check every month.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47595246)

and nah, your SAHW would never qualify, bc i'm sure the only daycares that can get funding under the bill are those fully accredited, regulated, etc

all that said i wish more employers would offer this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47595360)

Employer sponsored daycares are great, but rare. My wife's company had one of these and it's really good to be able to have your kid in the same building where you work from an efficiency standpoint. Women who want to nurse can continue to do so while they're back to the office, and it sets a culture of keeping normal hours and having people in-person. Parents are on their best behavior because they don't want word to get back if they are entitled cunts like some parents can be at more corporate daycare chains. And the facility is open whenever the office is open, which is way more convenient than having some facility that follows a weird holiday schedule, etc.

Having kids stay home with a mom who was a teacher or nurse is great. They are sympathetic, know how to deal with kids/childhood development, etc. Having a kid stay at home with a former white collar law shrew who is putting her career on hold to "raise kids" she started having at age 38 is a fucking disaster and you are better off with two working parents and daycare. And LOL at leaving your kids at home with a Jamaican nanny until they are 4 years old like I have seen a lot of wealthy people in NYC do. The nannies are on their cell phone all day and you still have to pay for classes and shit for them to do.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47596061)

from an efficiency standpoint

from an efficiency standpoint

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47596505)

i have a crazy idea: ban women from working or being educated past HS. Not that furking hard

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47596833)

If the folks running these companies understand the value of on-site child care facilities, why the mandate? Anyone who thinks you've got to force business executives to make profitable decisions is deeply misguided and doesn't know how to run a business

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47596750)

*rubs hands*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5519348&forum_id=2#47597064)