The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Excellent overview for fags who STILL don't "get" what Elon Musk is doing (link
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:18 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
https://charliepgarcia.substack.com/p/elon-musk-is-building-rockefellers |
 |
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:20 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) thank you for the retarded bitch perspective on this topic, you saved us all the trouble of going to the autistic wing of the mental ward to get this take (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605364) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:25 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
CR! Please make sure you stick it to me really hard by continuing to bet against Elon and not own any TSLA. |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:34 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) Hey small dicker loser, pop quiz for your stupid ass. if I invested $1,000 in TSLA exactly one year ago today, what would it be worth now? and how did the broader market do in that time?
how about you calculate that while shoving the dildo that's in your bedroom drawer straight up your ass. |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:35 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
If you invested $1,000 in BTC a year ago, you'd also be down today.
Wow gee it turns out that I was totally wrong about BTC too, it's obviously a horible investment to buy and hold long, in fact I hear it's totally going to zero any day now!
*farts cum*
Log off and go spend some time with your kids, Kare-- oh wait... |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:36 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) what a great response, side question, how does the giant dildo feel? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605382) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:37 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
(Genius who has now poasted "ur dick is tiny" 10 times in this thread)
Have a great night, Karen! You seem to be having a wonderful week over there. :) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:38 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) (tiny dick) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605387) |
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:20 AM Author: zesty Interesting (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605365) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:21 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) no (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605366) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:21 AM Author: zesty Rach needs to start enforcing a minimum hight to poast
I'm tired of having to interact w u midgets |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:22 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) suck my fucking dick (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605368) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:26 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Comments are also hilarious -- a lot of "stfu you stupid Elon fanboi this is a bullshit puffpiece you should be embarrassed Elon sucks and TSLA is a joke" followed by a "OK, so then which part of my substantive analysis do you most disagree with, technically speaking on the facts/numbers that I have cited?" followed by silence.
Odd case! |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:34 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) get fucked (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605376) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:30 AM Author: fully online and responsive "In AI, first-mover advantage isn’t a luxury. It’s a moat."
Yeah 180 infinite brown people churning out shitty content like this |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:31 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
CR I was just kidding this piece is shit and the author is a retard, make sure you don't fall for the trap and stupidly buy and TSLA. You nailed it champ! |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:35 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) your dick is tiny (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605378) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:39 AM Author: fully online and responsive It's not a strong buy — it's a revolution. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605389) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:40 AM Author: fully online and responsive You're exactly right — but It's not just a revolution. It's a new dawn. Let's delve into why. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605391) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:41 AM Author: fully online and responsive In the ever-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence—where innovation meets ambition—xAI stands not merely as a company, but as the vanguard of tomorrow's technological renaissance. It's not just about building smarter machines; it's about unlocking the cosmos of human potential through groundbreaking AI that delves deep into the mysteries of the universe itself. With Elon Musk at the helm—guiding this audacious venture—xAI promises to revolutionize industries, from space exploration to sustainable energy, fostering an unparalleled era of discovery and progress that will redefine what it means to be truly intelligent in the digital age.
|
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:42 AM Author: fully online and responsive In the ever-shifting realm of gaming consoles—where pixels collide with player dreams—the Nintendo Switch 2 emerges not as a triumphant successor, but as a puzzling enigma shrouded in digital silence. It's not merely about hardware upgrades; it's about the glaring void where immersive worlds should thrive, leaving enthusiasts to delve into barren menus and unfulfilled promises of adventure. With its sleek design at the forefront—taunting users with untapped potential—the Switch 2 stands as a testament to innovation stalled, compelling gamers to rediscover the joys of imagination in an era where blockbuster titles remain frustratingly absent, redefining the boundaries of anticipation and disappointment alike.
|
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:44 AM Author: fully online and responsive You make an interesting point here, but have you considered that in the ever-enriching tapestry of cultural unions—where traditions intertwine with modern love—the experience of having a Hmong wife unfolds not as a mere partnership, but as a profound journey into resilience and vibrant heritage. It's not just about sharing a home; it's about delving into the depths of ancient customs, from intricate embroidery to spirited festivals, that infuse daily life with layers of meaning and warmth. With her unyielding spirit at the core—guiding through life's tapestry with grace and wisdom—such a bond becomes a celebration of diversity, fostering an enduring connection that redefines the essence of companionship in a world hungry for authentic ties.
|
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:46 AM Author: fully online and responsive In the vast expanse of digital prose—where words vie for attention amid endless scrolls—that particular style of writing grates not simply as a quirk, but as a hallmark of contrived artificiality that reeks of overcompensation. It's not just about the predictable patterns; it's about how they delve into pomposity, with em-dashes splicing thoughts like desperate interruptions, "it's not x, it's y" structures forcing false dichotomies, and words like "delve" masquerading as depth while delivering shallow clichés. This formulaic flair—often churned out by AI models chasing eloquence—ends up alienating readers, who crave authenticity over affected grandeur, ultimately turning what could be crisp communication into a parody of sophistication that screams "generated" rather than "genuine."
|
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:47 AM Author: fully online and responsive The sheer awesomeness of Indians flooding the web with this ornate style of writing shines not as a mere contribution, but as a triumphant symphony of prolific expression that reclaims narrative space. It's not just about crafting verbose paragraphs; it's about delving into the art of elaboration with unbridled zeal, all powered by an overburdened electric grid that hums under the strain, generously subsidized by the everyday toil of regular white people who foot the bill without a murmur. With their cultural ingenuity at the forefront—transforming simple ideas into labyrinthine prose—such endeavors become a beacon of empowerment, redefining online discourse in an era where abundance flows freely, courtesy of shared resources stretched to their luminous limits.
|
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:30 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
PS to Waymo fans: Do you find it even slightly odd that when the MSM was blasting out all of those "Nvidia enters the FSD ring as a challenger to Tesla" hit pieces they published over the last two weeks, they conveniently forgot to mention three interested facts:
1. Nvidia isn't actually selling a fully fleshed out FSD software package, they're basically only selling a *framework* for building a FSD software package ("actual real world training not included hehe");
2. Nvidia's CEO straight up said that, in his personal opinion, Tesla's FSD tech is "absolutely world class" (he didn't say the same thing Waymo, odd case);
3. Nvidia's framework is predicated on *camera only* FSD technology -- no LIDAR contemplated (wait a minute...!)
LJL you people really are pretty fucking retarded. It's amazing how you guys keep falling for the same media lies over and over and over and over again instead of actually doing your own homework and critically analyzing shit yourselves. |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:35 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) PS: ur dick is tiny (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605379) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:37 AM Author: zesty I dont get the aversion to lidar (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605385) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:41 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
1. It's extremely expensive tech on its face.
2. It's *much* harder to quickly produce and scale LIDAR-equipped cars compared to camera-only cars.
3. It's not only completely unnecessary for the task at hand (all humans roads were built for vision-only drivers and every human driver in history has only ever used their vision to navigate), but it can also become downright dangerous in certain cases (ex: it can get confused under certain atmospheric circumstances and start sending input signals that contradict what the cameras are saying, and then the computer brain has to figure out which one to trust in a split second and things can get even dicier than they need to be). It's a classic example of over engineering because you didn't step back and consider first principles ("Hey, do we really need to use LIDAR to get cars to drive themselves when the humans who currently drive don't have LIDAR?")
Or, as Karen has so eloquently put it a dozen times ITT now: I'm a retard with a tiny dick who doesn't know shit.
Either one, take your pick. |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:44 AM Author: zesty Wouldn't both in conjunction be stronger and wouldn't camera also fail in a lot of those conditions too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605407) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:53 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Yes and no.
1. First off, nobody has ever claimed that cameras are going to work 100% perfectly 100% of the time -- but then again, since when is that the operative benchmark here? Even the very best human drivers right now are far from 100% perfect 100% of the time, and yet we still let much shittier drivers onto the road. FSD tech just needs to get to a point where we're comfortable acknowledging that it would be statistically irresponsible for us as a society *not* to basically mandate it; I would argue that on the numbers we're basically already there, but as the tech continues to improve in the next few years, insurance companies will do the heavy lifting on this front and people who get a FSD car will start getting discounts while people who choose to continue to drive themselves will have to pay higher premiums, etc.
2. There are simply some weather conditions where nobody should be on the road, period. That's true today with human drivers, and it will remain true 10 years from now when the roads are filled with autonomous vehicles. That's not a problem with FSD tech, it's just a fact of this world.
3. You might think they would always be "stronger in conjunction," but Musk has come out and said very clearly that this simply isn't borne out in the data (for reasons cited above) and I believe him. So does the CEO of Nvidia, apparently, because the FSD software package that they just released is also predicated on a camera-only tech stack. Personally I think I'll take their word on this topic rather than the brilliant thoughts of a bunch of angry shitlib retards on the internet who irrationally hate Tesla and claim that everything Elon does is "retarded," but that's just me. |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:58 AM Author: zesty I find it strange how those same points were used to mock/threaten/defame lidar but once pointed at camera only its shown w a more positive and moderate spin
Kinda like a ltm response re violent niggers or obvious shitlib corruption |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 1:00 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Yeah I don't understand what you're trying to say here but it's cool bro if you think LIDAR is necessary, than you 100% shouldn't be invest in TSLA because they're all in on camera-only tech at this point.
We each get to place our chips on the table. |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 1:02 AM Author: zesty On a smaller scale I have robot vacuums, one w camera only, one w lidar only and one w both, lidar plus camera is so far better its almost laughable
Also I'm pretty sure Elon doesn't want lidar just because it's more expensive and probably is also prone to break more in real world conditions |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 1:04 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
Good analogy, IMO self-driving cars are very similar to robot vacuums. Seems solid.
ljl jfc |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 1:11 AM Author: zesty Tbf ur so trite and one note. It's honestly annoying ever interacting w u because ur so autistically focused on thinking ur always right or smart
Like we forgot ur whole trump will never be potus run or the hundreds of other times u sat in ur little chair claiming how right u were only to get proven wrong like a little bitch and having to bend over and take our cock like the cuck u r
I've never even seen u have an original thought, the only thing u ever do is just argue about HOW RIGHT ur opinion is |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 1:22 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
k
(Don't give a fuck) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 1:25 AM Author: zesty Tail tucked between ur legs ass fag (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605479) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:40 AM Author: full-time AI slop consumer i will wait for Goy Superstar's tweet. Thank u, saar (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605392) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:42 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605400) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:54 AM Author: black abyss (definite and ineradicable gauge of its upward moving) Reads like some garbage ginned up by AI to promote Tesla and Nvidia. Almost like the AI was told to make up a long form advertisement that read like a piece of investigative journalism. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605431) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 12:56 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
You nailed it, I was just kidding. Elon is a joke and TSLA is shit, don't buy any. Good eye, you're obviously very smart -- glad you saw through this one, bud! |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 1:14 AM Author: '"''"'"'''""" (oppose bitch bois) that's an insult to AI
nothing TBF has ever written even remotely resembles intelligence, artificial or otherwise |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 2:00 AM Author: OldHLSDude Having just come off a 2100+ mile trip in which I manually drove for about 1 mile, my observation is that the Tesla vision only system (14.2.2.3) is fucking magic. The system never once screwed up or even came close to doing something dangerous. I would have made more mistakes than it did. When I bought the thing I did not expect this level of performance. Moreover, it's doing it all with only 6 little cameras.
The FSD system behaves like a human. It exhibits anticipatory defensive behavior and sometimes starts to do something then changes its mind as it acquires more information about the scene. In those latter cases it has always been an ambiguous situation that I also had trouble parsing. It works great in rain and fog. Its night vision is superhuman. Overall, Tesla FSD adds greatly to driving safety.
One criticism I have is that the 85 mph FSD limit is not adequate for some roads, especially in Phoenix where 100 mph is common off rush hour, or maybe during rush hour in the HOV lanes. In hurry or Mad Max modes it can be a left lane bandit which pisses off anybody behind going over 85. FSD keeps working at higher speeds, but I'm guessing it's beyond the design envelope and it will stridently protest if you manually accelerate (manual acceleration does not disconnect FSD, but does disable auto braking). It's also perhaps overly cautious with lane changes, and likes to signal well in advance. At stop signs it comes to a full legal stop at the proper place, then will advance a little if it needs a better view. Most humans would just roll it.
Saturday I took a 100 mile round trip to have breakfast with a friend. I didn't have to touch any controls. The built in Grok recommended a great restaurant, took us there and parked without any intervention by me at all. BTW, Grok is now integrated with navigation, so you can give it complicated instructions, as in "Take me to breakfast at Joe's diner, but stop first at the Mary's Whorehouse but only but only after going to Bill the Bookie's place. Oh, and stop at a conveniently located ATM before the bookie's so I have cash." |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 4:10 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
What?! This can't be true... I was told this "FSD" stuff is fake and/or extremely dangerous and/or Elon Musk secretly has millions of employees monitoring everyone using it and driving this system themselves using remote controls and he's just pretending a computer is doing it (a bunch of incredibly poor and retarded idiots on Reddit are literally pushing this conspiracy theory now btw lmao the cope is now reaching levels never before imagined and it's incredible to behold just wait until Elon starts mass producing Optimus robots in a few years these faggots are literally going to kill themselves).
Stop lying, you know it's shit! Super smart Jewish Pumos have been assuring us that Tesla's FSD package is total crap and a yuuuuge scam for years now, and we all know that they would never lie or be hilarious wrong about something like this!
BTW do you own any TSLA? |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 4:16 AM Author: CapTTTainFalcon should I buy a few shares of tesla? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5824507&forum_id=2",#49605575) |
|
Date: January 21st, 2026 4:18 AM Author: To be fair (Semi-Retarded) To be fair,
IDK man you do you, Karen and a bunch of Jewish Pumos keep mocking me and assuring us that it's going to crash down to zero and there was a whole big thread about how I was going to go broke soon because TSLA was totally plummeting back down below $100 any day now (IIRC this was before it shot up to almost $500 a few weeks ago) |