The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
What has your wife, GF, sugar baby or female family said about the Clancy case?
| Gloostick | 08/20/26 |
| The Scrotum | 08/20/26 |
| Gloostick | 08/20/26 |
| The Scrotum | 08/20/26 |
| Metal Up Your Ass | 08/20/26 |
| Commonwealth of Niflheim | 08/20/26 |
| literal females on a jury in court | 08/20/26 |
| Commonwealth of Niflheim | 08/20/26 |
| you're the puppet | 08/20/26 |
| Commonwealth of Niflheim | 08/20/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:08 PM Author: Gloostick women nationwide are going BUCKWILD over this case, total insanity
even twitter "Pro Life" conservative type women are bird braining out hard
really makes me hate women |
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:13 PM Author: The Scrotum (gunneratttt) I've had so many fights with women over shit like Brock Turner and bear versus man on a hiking trail. It always ends badly.
My gf hasn't brought it up yet, but if she does I'll just change the subject. |
 |
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:20 PM Author: Gloostick pretty easy to make them look like evil insane psychos with this one imo
turner case was a joke but he was was alleged to be a rapist
bear vs. man is just women being retards incapable of weighing risks. Dumb but almost endearingly dumb
this is women defending someone who murdered there kids in cold blood |
|
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:28 PM Author: The Scrotum (gunneratttt) Of course it's easy to make them look like emotionally driven psychos; they are!
All I'm saying is that there won't be any logical reconciliation when you prove a woman is 180. |
|
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:23 PM Author: Metal Up Your Ass I hadn't heard of it until some chick asked me about it.
She says that the husband killed the kids and tried to kill her so he could be with his new chick. |
|
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:27 PM Author: Commonwealth of Niflheim (Prestige Feuds) Extreme birdbrain low IQ Reddit take. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5895385&forum_id=2",#50081472) |
|
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:24 PM Author: literal females on a jury in court Asked my Asian wife about it and she said the husband's phenotype is a dead giveaway that he's obviously guilty and she's innocent. She has a really hard time pronouncing "phenotype" though so I ended up making her repeat herself several times which was kind of awkward (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5895385&forum_id=2",#50081448) |
|
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:27 PM Author: Commonwealth of Niflheim (Prestige Feuds) I really felt Lindsay was not criminally responsible after the state rested. Their theory of the case didn't make any sense. They set out to prove she was a horrible person and her entire family and coworkers said she was great. They said her suicide attempt wasn't fake and she is paralyzed and the wounds looked bad. Her shrinks seemed completely retarded and like they were doing the bare minimum and lacked relevant experience. She was obviously overmedicated and had a bad reaction to the medicine. And the state never offered any motive. You have a lady who snapped, reached out for help, got bad care, has no motive, and no one thought she was a shitty person or a manipulator.
Then I heard the defense case which I thought tilted back towards the prosecution. The big hurdles for Lindsay are number one she didn't tell anyone about the hallucinations before the murders. She said she only heard them one time ever, on that day. And also she had been weaned off most of the medication by the time of the murders and everyone said she seemed to be doing better and was great to be around.
Never seen a trial where both sides made me root for the other side. It's a tough one but it really comes down to which experts the jury trusts. I felt like the defense experts were a little too in the tank for the defendant. They got a little cute and just seemed like they had formed their opinions before looking at the evidence.
This is one where we just have to trust the jury. I think they will do the right thing. They're either going to conclude she's a selfish monster that can never be let out or they believe that she went psychotic, sought help, got some really bad care, drugs made her worse, and she was trying desperately to keep it together and keep up appearances.
I still lean not guilty by reason of insanity but if the jury returns a unanimous conviction I will trust their judgment. |
|
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:31 PM Author: you're the puppet (I have the emotional height of an angry 6" gnome ) I think this is sad and I wonder how much of this is because of her psychiatrist, therapist, and big pharma. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5895385&forum_id=2",#50081490) |
|
Date: August 20th, 2026 7:36 PM Author: Commonwealth of Niflheim (Prestige Feuds) Mfcr
Whether or not she's guilty her docs were fucking insane.
Alia Goodhart the Indian woman with the shaved head was pure trash. Jennifer Tufts her main shrink was a pompous ass. She had almost no experience but thought she knew everything. She screwed up the most. Nurse Jollatta was the best one. Seemed professional but she refuted a lot of the testimony of the other docs. Agreed with the defense on a lot of key issues.
I think a really big issue at the heart of this case is that none of these mandated reporters ever escalated Lindsay to the next more serious level of treatment because while she admitted to thinking about suicide all the time she said she never had a plan. She was terrified of the state taking her kids or of getting committed so she hid a lot of this from the docs, and the docs never intuited that something was seriously wrong her mentally.
This case is really tough and a lot of the burn the witch types out there haven't followed the trial and don't know the facts. |