The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Drumpf goes from +18 to -23 among "uneducated" Americans (link)
| Penis Head | 07/18/26 |
| gunnerretttired | 07/19/26 |
| Penis Head | 07/19/26 |
| gunnerretttired | 07/19/26 |
| Penis Head | 07/19/26 |
| gunnerretttired | 07/19/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 18th, 2026 11:54 PM Author: Penis Head (oppose bitchbois) https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-approval-rating-low-uneducated-americans-12205463
Identical to the shift among xo posters, which is weird. |
Date: July 19th, 2026 12:18 AM Author: gunnerretttired (gunneratttt) Headline conveniently doesn't mention that the decline is nearly identical to the decline in support overall
It's so insane you libs cannot help but embellish and misrepresent things, especially regarding Trump when stories are often so bad the truth is more than enough. Instead you have to lie and deceive, and after a decade you still can't see why so many people are receptive to dismissing everything is fake news. You're the reason Trump is covered kn Teflon and even though he's on the way out you STILL can't stop doing it. |
 |
Date: July 19th, 2026 1:02 AM Author: Penis Head (oppose bitchbois) Here's the headline: "Trump’s Approval Rating Plummets to All-Time Low With Uneducated Americans"
Here's the OP: "Drumpf goes from +18 to -23 among "uneducated" Americans (link)"
Which of these either "embellish[es] or misrepresent[s] things"?
(You are permitted to deploy your burst-IQ in answering this question) |
|
Date: July 19th, 2026 1:13 AM Author: gunnerretttired (gunneratttt) The headline implies the movement is different from the overall population. If a headline said "Apple stock plummets by 20%" a reader would think something happened with Apple specifically, but if the entire market also declined by 20% that isn't the case. It's leaving out important context on purpose to create a false impression.
Liberals have been concerned about Trump capturing so much of the low education vote. This headline is designed to create the impression that Trump's grasp on that demo has declined specifically. But the truth is that he's lost support across the board. |
|
Date: July 19th, 2026 1:18 AM Author: Penis Head (oppose bitchbois) Bruh. Use your brain. This is a 41% swing. Do you think he also had a 41% swing among the college educated from Feb 2025 to July 2026?
Or you believe that he was +18 across the board at the time of his election? (which I guess would explain "the biggest landslide in US history") |
|
Date: July 19th, 2026 1:45 AM Author: gunnerretttired (gunneratttt) That doesn't address my point at all: that the decline in this demo doesn't significantly deviate from overall decline, even though the headline implies that. The performance relative to other demos doesn't matter because they are all captured in the overall population. If Trump's Hispanic vote had a 40% swing along with the overall population, but the black swing was only 5% because it went from -90% to -95%, he wouldn't have lost Hispanic voters at a greater rate than the overall population.
You seem think that there's a binary choice between no college and college, but there are multiple categories. |