if the goal was to kill all jews, 6 million bullets would have been cheaper and faster

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855180&forum_id=2)#49805252)

The Rothschilds and the Epsteins actually funded Hitler when he was younger. The only thing they regretted, per Ariane de Rothschild's implication in a released Epstein email – https://jmail.world/thread/vol00009-efta01009881-pdf?view=inbox – was that their "generosity" was not rewarded.

I honestly hate Zionazis 100x more than regular Nazis.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855180&forum_id=2)#49805322)

“I said to him, ‘Simon, you are telling a lie,’” Bauer recalled in an interview Tuesday. “He said, ‘Sometimes you need to do that to get the results for things you think are essential.’” – https://www.jta.org/2017/01/31/united-states/remember-the-11-million-why-an-inflated-victims-tally-irks-holocaust-historians

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855180&forum_id=2)#49805357)

Do you know about Frankists? They were/are an evil cult of people who are ethnically Jewish but their "religion" is an intentional subversion of Jewish values. It's supposedly not active anymore, but I have a theory that it's secretly practiced to this day in large numbers, so I'm going to use the present tense. Their belief system is built around the idea that evil is good. They intentionally break all of the Jewish laws. They're especially focused on sexual depravity, particularly incest and pedophilia. They're like the cult of Ba'al, although the latter is not limited to ethnic Jews.

I'm pretty solid on that part, and I think Candace Owens has talked about it, so a lot of you guys might already know about them. But here's where it gets kooky. These people were doing their thing, beginning in the 1700s, and people started catching on. They were raping kids and poisoning wells and everything else people do when they're intentionally trying to be as evil as possible. A large part of Frankism is about deception... pretending to be something you're not. So at first they claimed to be Jews, but regular (rabbinic) Jews obviously rejected them because they were literally the opposite of Jews morally.

So what the Frankists did is... they sought protection from the Catholic Church by pretending they were VICTIMS of rabbinic Jews. And they fucking turned the tables. They started claiming that REGULAR Jews had these vile practices. They threw people off THEIR scent by throwing the normal Jews under the bus. And that's a huge part of what ultimately set the climate for the Holocaust (IMO).

Then a lot of them infiltrated the Catholic Church and other religions, but again, I truly believe they're still practicing. Maybe now it's under the cult of Ba'al banner... I'm really not sure. But learning all of this has been huge for me because it explains how one group of demonic "Jews" ruined it for the rest of us (I'm ethnically half Jewish but wasn't brought up in the culture or religion) in a way that goes beyond, you know, people incorrectly extrapolated. These fuckers literally intentionally convinced everyone that Judaism was inherently evil just so people wouldn't suspect THEM.

If this sounds crazy to any of you, I invite you to investigate who wrote the history textbooks. (BTW, I also have a theory that Zionism is directly related to these demonic cults, especially when you consider how few Zionists actually practice Judaism.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855180&forum_id=2)#49805469)

I think the Frankist theory is an oversimplification. It's like an answer in need of a question. The real question is why are Zionists (not all Jews) so fucked up. I think that's a legitimate question, but I wouldn't jump to a far-fetched conclusion about it. And I think the answer is that it was simply an easy pitch. You're right that many Zios are not religious Jews, in fact, some of them are Christian goyim!

But I think it's rooted in the simple concept that many Jews feel like they need a homeland, they need to have the power to defend themselves, and wouldn't it be great if we had our own language and society and no one else could be a part of it. It's the same thing many people want for their people. Blacks want to see a Black President, they want to see their people rise up. China wants a strong China. It's just human nature to observe that people are generally tribal. And I think a ton of goys are jealous that Jews in Israel get to make this society that's just about them and their way of life and they can give the middle finger to everyone else. A lot of groups wish they had the power to do that, but they don't.

But Jews left Ancient Judea 2000 years ago and some other group of people were living there so in order to do their little plan they had to ruffle some feathers, and then they just kept doubling down and doubling down. Like yeah Larry Ellison isn't a religious Jew but he's an ethnic Jew and he likes the idea of his people and his ethnicity being strong and powerful and he doesn't feel bad when brownoids get blown up over it. Personally that's easier for me to understand than the Frankists and poisoning wells and pedo cults and Ba'al tbh.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855180&forum_id=2)#49805570)

Before I talk about the Zio motivations/whether Zionism is connected to Frankism: What do you think about my theory that blood libel against rabbinic Jews (e.g. Lwów disputation) contributed to antisemitic undercurrents that helped the Holocaust take off? I'm not saying that this stuff was a large part of what motivated Hitler himself, but it seems plausible that Frankist deception planted a bunch of seeds in people's minds about Jews being pedo rapists and ritual murderers of Christians, which spread and grew over generations and ultimately helped Hitler's message catch on.

As far as what makes Zios act the way they act... of course there are tiers of Zionism. Before I knew how "Israel" was formed, even I was like, "oh yeah it kinda makes sense for Jews to have their own country." And as I'm sure you know, most synagogues and Sunday schools conveniently leave the Nakba out of their curricula. My mom told me that she was told that it was "a land without people for a people without a land." She was taught Hebrew songs about how it was a barren, empty desert and the Jews turned it into a fertile, thriving home. So there are a lot of people of every religion who could be considered Zionists in the sense of, like, they don't even know that there were already 700,000 people in Palestine, so they have no issue with a country being carved out for Jews after the Holocaust. People who feel that way are misled, not evil.

Then there are people who know how "Israel" was founded and are like, "that was wrong but they're there now sooo I guess it's a Jewish state now 🤷" kinda like how most people feel about America I guess. Not an explicitly evil category either.

Finally, there are the people who believe in the Greater Israel Project. They think Israel should just keep expanding by murdering and displacing everyone around them. And on the same level are the people who originally supported the founding of Israel, which obviously also involved a lot of murder and displacement lol. This camp is firmly evil and THIS is the group that I theorize descended from/is still tied to Frankism.

So that's just breaking down different types of Zionists in terms of what they think "Israel" should be in terms of its existence. But then there's the question of, what does a "Jewish state" even mean? And anyone who's OK with an ethnosupremacist apartheid state is in the evil category IMHO. If it's just like, "yeah let the Jews gather there in large numbers and if they happen to run the government because there are so many of them there, that's fine"... that's naive and disconnected from reality because it IS an ethnosupremacist apartheid state and there were already people there. But in theory, sure, let people of whatever group gather wherever they want.

Soooo that's my breakdown on different flavors of Zionism and how evil I think they are, lol. My theory about Frankists just applies to the ones who are a-OK with murdering and displacing people for an apartheid state. These people see ethnic Jews as racially superior and the "Chosen People" who can basically do whatever they want because... God said so? Even though most of them don't even believe in God?

Personally I don't think, like, Ashkenazi Jews should all be kicked back to Europe or whatever. I just want everyone to have equal rights and for Zios to stop fucking killing innocent people and stealing land :(

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855180&forum_id=2)#49805669)

I mean, you don't even have to inject the Frankists into history or say it had anything to do with Hitler. I think for Hitler in specific he hated Jews because he tied them into this concept called Judeo-Bolshevism, the idea that Jews were spiritually Communists and that Communists were Germany's greatest enemy. Many Jews were Communists such as Leon Trotsky.

Mein Kampf is basically BLM for Germans, it's an enormous list of grievances about how the world had treated Germany really, really bad and everyone was against them. This felt real to many people at the time due to economic circumstances and how everyone remembered they were really rich a generation prior. Hitler was a conspiracy theorist who believed that Jews were to blame for the downfall of the German army during WWI. A lot of people blamed Jews because they couldn't conceive of Germany losing a war they seemed to be winning. They ultimately lost because they pissed off the entire world with their actions (such as bombing Belgium, a neutral country) and the whole planet embargoed them until they only had turnips left to eat and eventually the military mutinied. On top of that a year after Germany lost the war there was a Communist uprising and attempt to take over the country like what happened in Russia in 1917. So people were really freaked out about Commies and Jews were easy to equate to Commies and basically every time Hitler said this stuff he got a really big reaction from the crowd so he kept doubling down on it. This is all a really long way of saying that the goyim in Europe hated the Jews since forever and constantly fucked with them and did pogroms and shit and inquisitions for centuries and it had nothing to do with Frankists. And Blood Libel was something that famous European theologians and scholars had been promoting so far back I don't even know when it began. Hitler's case was more immediate where people were really pissed off about being poor and having lost WWI and the threat of Communism was real and freaked everybody out. Small step to go from that to blaming 'Judeo-Bolshevism' and the Lügenpresse and the Rotschilds.

Your breakdown of the types of Zios is accurate and I mostly agree. Very well said. This goes back to my point thought about Jewish chauvinism (among zios) which is this idea of superiority. All I heard growing up from Jewish classmates was how the Palestinians weren't using the land for any reason because they were stupid etc. They have been denigrating the locals since time immemorial. They have to fundamentally dehumanize them in order to treat them the way they do. And you're right Isreal is a Jewish supremacist state. And I don't blame you for being against that. I often joke that I would support Israel if they let me have apartheid South Africa back. Or Rhodesia. Or French Indochina. Like what do I care if the Jews murder a bunch of brown people if I can have my white country in Africa back. I'm kidding of course but you see the correlation. Rhodeisia and South Africa failed because Britain cut off trade with them and later the US and these states couldn't function without outside support, without trade and weapons etc. But ODD CASE Israel continues to get that support in a similar situation. Nelson Mandela said Yasser Arafat and the Palestinians shared a similar struggle. But the Blacks got Africa back and yet the Arabs still don't control the Levant. Very odd case indeed!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5855180&forum_id=2)#49805741)