The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Is height an advantage or disadvantage in modern warfare?
| onyx fragrant rehab | 08/16/26 |
| judgmental ocher institution pisswyrm | 08/19/26 |
| judgmental ocher institution pisswyrm | 08/19/26 |
| mind-boggling wild tanning salon bbw | 08/19/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 16th, 2026 1:26 AM Author: onyx fragrant rehab Seems like it would be very situational based on the cover available. A 6'4 chad can comfortably aim over a 5'6 brick wall that a manlet can only cower behind as cover.
But if ambused in a field or evading drones or something you are suddenly a lanky goofball about to star in a liveleak clip |
Date: August 19th, 2026 8:20 AM Author: judgmental ocher institution pisswyrm Operators are constantly doing shit that would cause someone to get injured. Incredibly Tall guys are more likely to fuck up their knees and shit imo.
Afaik modern war means shooting off into the horizon usually with artillery or just using drones. Also Night Vision.
If we ever did Single Combat vs Bin Laden (6’5 iirc) you’d want a guy with Reach. |
|
Date: August 19th, 2026 8:21 AM Author: judgmental ocher institution pisswyrm Btw liveleak shut down awhile ago (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893543&forum_id=2\u0026hid=",#50077623) |
|
Date: August 19th, 2026 8:34 AM Author: mind-boggling wild tanning salon bbw It has been a disadvantage since long before the modern era, basically since widespread adoption of individual firearms rather than melee weapons (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893543&forum_id=2\u0026hid=",#50077629) |