The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Zombie-like Theatre Gay Wizard | 01/06/26 | | thirsty arrogant corner police squad | 01/06/26 | | Haunting internet-worthy turdskin | 01/06/26 | | thirsty arrogant corner police squad | 01/06/26 | | Haunting internet-worthy turdskin | 01/06/26 | | thirsty arrogant corner police squad | 01/06/26 | | Zombie-like Theatre Gay Wizard | 01/06/26 | | thirsty arrogant corner police squad | 01/06/26 | | Zombie-like Theatre Gay Wizard | 01/06/26 | | chocolate beady-eyed depressive candlestick maker | 01/07/26 | | Bespoke maroon university corn cake | 01/06/26 | | drunken impressive trump supporter office | 01/06/26 | | Haunting internet-worthy turdskin | 01/06/26 | | sickened roommate | 01/06/26 | | Haunting internet-worthy turdskin | 01/06/26 | | Spectacular dilemma | 01/06/26 | | khaki national security agency | 01/06/26 | | Self-centered duck-like piazza | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: thirsty arrogant corner police squad
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026hid=",#49568134) |
|
|