The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Hairraiser rehab | 01/06/26 | | rambunctious motley theatre background story | 01/06/26 | | Territorial multi-colored elastic band | 01/06/26 | | rambunctious motley theatre background story | 01/06/26 | | Territorial multi-colored elastic band | 01/06/26 | | rambunctious motley theatre background story | 01/06/26 | | Hairraiser rehab | 01/06/26 | | rambunctious motley theatre background story | 01/06/26 | | Hairraiser rehab | 01/06/26 | | Frum Home | 01/07/26 | | cobalt deer antler | 01/06/26 | | white forum generalized bond | 01/06/26 | | Territorial multi-colored elastic band | 01/06/26 | | brindle volcanic crater public bath | 01/06/26 | | Territorial multi-colored elastic band | 01/06/26 | | Stubborn national | 01/06/26 | | out-of-control marketing idea | 01/06/26 | | Adventurous parlor pozpig | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: rambunctious motley theatre background story
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026hid=",#49568134) |
|
|