The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
π¨π¨π¨ JUDGMENT ENTERED - BENZO NOT ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION π¨π¨π¨
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 30th, 2026 6:38 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle roast beef 06/30/2026 69 JUDGMENT entered pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), that the case is dismissed for failure to establish by a preponderance of evidence that petitioner is entitled to compensation. (Service on parties made.) (sm) (Entered: 06/30/2026) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49972020) |
Date: June 30th, 2026 6:59 PM Author: Know-it-all razzmatazz messiness filthpig Where is the fucking ruling? This is bullshit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49972083) |
 |
Date: June 30th, 2026 7:01 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle roast beef cr. he has a month to file some affidavit now. jfc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49972089) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:02 PM Author: stimulating self-centered senate foreskin affidavit for what? public records exemptions or grounds justifying a motion for reconsideration? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49975932) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:09 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle roast beef chatgpt thinks the pauper's redaction request wasn't supported by evidence and the court is requiring an affidavit before it grants his redaction request.
wonder what the pauper is trying to hide! |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:11 PM Author: jade embarrassed to the bone locus background story Uncle Dave's Salami (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49975944) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:12 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle roast beef (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49975950) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:12 PM Author: stimulating self-centered senate foreskin hopefully the government lawyer really cares about the rules of evidence and attacks the authenticity of his folder of "screenshots"
was his redaction request filed pro se? |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:13 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle roast beef his lawyer filed the redaction request. he can still get PAID for further work.
|
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:13 PM Author: stimulating self-centered senate foreskin LJL what a fucking racket
how does one get involved in this shit? |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:15 PM Author: impressive sepia crackhouse legend CQ (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49975956) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:13 PM Author: anal fat ankles I have no doubt he is asking the court to redact all of it and attaching xo threads to his affidavit and claiming that he is an online bullying victim. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49975955) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:15 PM Author: impressive sepia crackhouse legend Judge probably loling, trying to register (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49975957) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:17 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle roast beef WGWIG judge shah very curiously following a certain poaster's africa trip (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49975961) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:15 PM Author: stimulating self-centered senate foreskin if his defense counsel or any member of the court is reading this thread, please let me know how I can get involved in this racket (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49975958) |
|
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:18 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle roast beef AI doesnt know when the decision will be public:
Earliest realistic public release: shortly after July 30, 2026, if petitioner files no affidavit or files one that the special master promptly finds insufficient.
More likely: early to mid-August 2026, because the special master will need to review the affidavit, decide the redaction issue, and then have the final public version posted.
Possible later: late August or September 2026, if petitioner seeks an extension, respondent is allowed to respond to the affidavit, or the special master takes longer to resolve the redaction dispute.
The rules do not give a hard publication deadline once a redaction motion is pending. They say that where no redaction motion is filed, the full decision will be made public within a “reasonable time” after the 14-day redaction period expires. But that default provision does not cleanly answer this situation because a redaction motion was filed and remains unresolved. |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 9:12 PM Author: Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle (πΊπΈ π΅π±) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49995357) |
|
Date: July 12th, 2026 9:12 PM Author: Buttsex for thee, buttsex for me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49995358) |