Can Men Get Pregnant?
| Cruel-hearted mahogany gaping | 05/04/22 | | Stimulating jap center | 05/04/22 | | electric church sex offender | 05/04/22 | | doobsian skinny woman theatre | 05/04/22 | | electric church sex offender | 05/04/22 | | doobsian skinny woman theatre | 05/04/22 | | Citrine Bespoke Sanctuary | 05/04/22 | | violent comical senate | 05/04/22 | | Stimulating jap center | 05/04/22 | | appetizing geriatric death wish psychic | 05/04/22 | | diverse stead | 01/14/26 | | diverse stead | 01/14/26 | | diverse stead | 01/15/26 | | diverse stead | 01/15/26 | | nyuug | 01/19/26 | | nyuug | 01/20/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | razzmatazz ruddy stage cuckoldry | 01/14/26 | | amethyst new version nursing home | 01/15/26 | | Cerebral Half-breed Parlor | 01/15/26 | | Don't be a retard, Harry | 01/19/26 | | 6 7 | 01/25/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:28 PM Author: Stimulating jap center
"With our understanding constantly evolving, it’s important to honor the fact that one’s gender doesn’t determine whether they can become pregnant. Many men have had children of their own, and many more will likely do so in the future."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#44454608)
|
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:36 PM Author: doobsian skinny woman theatre
“To our knowledge, there has not yet been a case of pregnancy in [a biologically male] individual.”
Is the “to our knowledge” qualifier really necessary here?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#44454641) |
 |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:18 PM Author: amethyst new version nursing home
Pregnancy via the abdominal cavity
It has also been suggested that it may be possible for AMAB folks to carry a baby in the abdominal cavity.
People have made this leap based on the fact that a very tiny percentage of eggs are fertilized outside of the uterus in what is known as an ectopic pregnancy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49592650) |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:14 PM Author: Cerebral Half-breed Parlor
why won't shitlibs testifying before congress and scotus say what they mean: "man" and "woman" is purely psychological, can be chosen and changed at will by the individual, and is not subject to review. it is objectively meaningless. but then it's an invalid class for the purpose of the law - if you can't define it you can't distinguish it, and if you can't distinguish it you can't protect it. next up: whites start identifying as black on college applications and government contracts.
and why don't republicans just steal their language and define "woman" as "a person with a uterus and ovaries"? or "a person with xx chromosomes?"
this shit is so silly. what a joke of a country.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49592636) |
|
|