LMAO stay mad as fuckkkk, faggot!

Hey remember like a week ago when you guys were like "LMAO TACO Trump never does shit, nothing will happen to Don Lemon"? IMO this was before Trump revealed himself to be LITERALLY HITLER OMG by BRUTALIZING THE 1ST AMENDMENT through the HORRIBLE AND UNLAWFUL ARREST OF BELOVED JOURNALIST DON LEMON.

You people are such hysterical faggots it's truly unreal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49635090)

8

0

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632492)

durrrr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632738)

BTW — what is the liberal POV of what should happen to J6ers, and if you think these are comparable events, why aren’t you applying the same outcome to them?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632549)

What Lemon did was worse because he knew all of the protesters and met with them earlier

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632612)

No jurors will convict Don Lemon. That's the difference. We know you guys can't integrate in normal western societies, but that's how we function in them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632672)

but if we're building a case that he violated FACE despite claiming to be a journalist, his appeal for, essentially, monetization during the interruption seems relevant.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632652)

Im an absolutist about freedom of religion, too. But if this is extended to Muslims, freedom of religion vanishes.

I hope by the 21st C we have had enough time pass since the Enlightenment not to be retarded about this any more. You cannot tolerate intolerance. You cannot begin with some "blank slate", where a Somalian or a lib are gifted these "rights"

Free speech works in a western homogenous context - and it makes that society the best in the world. Freedom of religion works in a Christian society. You can be atheist or Lutheran or Catholic, etc. No one cares.

But no... you cannot give libs free speech. You cannot give shariah dudes free religion. We must stop being dumb about this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632596)

It’s like that smug atheist meme that goes like, “you should let in a billion Somali refugees because Jesus preached compassion in the Bible. I don’t believe in Jesus and that argument wouldn’t work on me. But if I use it on you, you’ll let in people who will vote for my political party”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632642)

an

@ToTheBreakOfDan

Don Lemon 15 seconds after arriving in prison

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632658)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823914&forum_id=2#49601078

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632757)

Do you guys remember the early 2016 days when Lemon spent multiple interviews suck daddy Donald's dick?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632902)

https://x.com/KatieMiller/status/2017226316391616622

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49632929)

Now how can we make this worse???

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49633005)

"Why do you annoying faggots spend so much time and energy leveraging the justice system to try and persecute your political enemies? It's really annoying and dumb and it makes you look pathetic," sneered the shitlib in 2026 without even the slightest trace of self-awareness.

Get bent you fucking faggot.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49635094)

Srs question — do you think barging into a church during Sunday services, not leaving when the pastors demand it, and shouting BLM chants until everyone has to leave is a crime?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49635149)

Wall Street Apes

@WallStreetApes

Investigation into ICE protesters storming the Minnesota Church reveals Don Lemon didn’t just happen to be there

Don Lemon was part of the planning and was provided logistics days in advance

Storming the church was a highly organized event by Democrats

“Developing — a new federal arrest is drawing attention to what prosecutors say was Don Lemon's role in planning and recording the disturbing protest of demonstrators storming that Minnesota church service.

A Temple University student has now surrendered on federal charges admitting he helped Don Lemon with logistics and local contacts ahead of that anti-ICE protest — Court records and social media posts show Richardson describing himself as assisting Don Lemon in the days leading up to the protest — Prosecutors say this new arrest undercuts that defense, suggesting planning and not just passive coverage.”

https://x.com/WallStreetApes/status/2019567524514574641

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49650659)

and also what legal fees unfold

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49650703)

“sure, just doing my job haha”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49651136)

apparently this is the SCOTUS case that will be cited against Lemon. it deals only with a contract claim based upon a newspaper's promise to keep a source's name confidential, but it has this passage too. Lemon literally walked in on and disrupted a religious service.

====

This case however, is not controlled by this line of cases but rather by the equally well-established line of decisions holding that generally applicable laws do not offend the First Amendment simply because their enforcement against the press has incidental effects on its ability to gather and report the news. As the cases relied on by respondents recognize, the truthful information sought to be published must have been lawfully acquired. The press may not with impunity break and enter an office or dwelling to gather news. Nei- ther does the First Amendment relieve a newspaper reporter of the obligation shared by all citizens to respond to a grand jury subpoena and answer questions relevant to a criminal in- vestigation, even though the reporter might be required to reveal a confidential source. Branzburg v. Hayes, 408 U.S. 665 (1972). The press, like others interested in publishing, may not publish copyrighted material without obeying the copyright laws. See Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broad- casting Co., 433 U.S. 562, 576-579 (1977). Similarly, the media must obey the National Labor Relations Act, Associ- ated Press v. NLRB, 301 U.S. 103 (1937), and the Fair Labor Standards Act, Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. Walling, 327 U.S. 186, 192-193 (1946); may not restrain trade in violation of the antitrust laws, Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1 (1945); Citizen Publishing Co. v. United States, 394 U.S. 131, 139 (1969); and must pay non- discriminatory taxes. Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105, 112 (1943); Minneapolis Star and Tribune Co. v. Min nesota Commissioner of Revenue, 460 U.S. 575, 581-583 (1983). Cf. University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC, 493 U.S. 182 , 201-202 (1990). It is therefore beyond dispute that "[t]he publisher of a newspaper has no special immunity from the application of general laws. He has no special privilege to invade the rights and liberties of others." Associated Press v. NLRB, supra, at 132-133. Accordingly, enforce- ment of such general laws against the press is not subject to stricter scrutiny than would be applied to enforcement against other persons or organizations.

Cohen v. Cowles Media Co. (90-634), 501 U.S. 663 (1991)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5828624&forum_id=2\u0026hid=#49660717)