(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49597220)

america first.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49597932)

JFC are ALL xoFarm Animals secret closet cases?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49598058)

God damn Charles is such a shitty poaster lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49596786)

The current situation is: didn't get Greenland and doesn't have a coherent path to do so.

So cheerlead all you want- you're cheerleading a failure.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49596895)

We are doing Panama.

We are doing Suez.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49596978)

i think you're probably kidding but this place is so retarded now i can imagine many poasters saying this sincerely

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49597928)

Minneapolis pop: 428k

Los Angeles pop: 3.9mm

Don't even pretend it's the same. We could just take greenland if we wanted to. We wouldn't even bother going in their "cities." We would just make our own, pretty much whereever we want, and mine all the rare earth minerals

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49598000)

yeah, they're not the same -- "WE" *ARE* minneapolis and LA! literally! they are US cities full of US citizens. shouldn't we be enforcing our law on our own people before we consider imposing it on others?

and how is this MAGA or america first? aren't both those about making AMERICA better for AMERICANS? how tf does spending your money and resources trying to annex a sparsely populated iceberg make *YOUR* life better? are you afraid of russia or china crossing the atlantic and think more military bases in GREENLAND will make you feel safer?

this bort was anti-foreign war, pro-domestic populism. now everyone is neocon. it's like your entire conception of history and governance is ww2 and napoleon, and that we're playing a game of civilization where "winning" means painting the map. meanwhile people still can't afford houses and wages are still stagnant. wtf is WRONG with you people?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49598316)

And the case for taking it is pretty clear. China can totally fuck us over with export restrictions on rare earth minerals, which would indeed make life much worse for americans in innumberable ways. Getting greenland is strategic insurance against that, in the same vein as reviving American manufacturing capacity.

Maybe you disagree. Maybe you love globalism and think it's superior to a self-sufficient country. But some some shitlib protests have nothing to do with the questions of geopolitical strategy posed. Not that I think Trump's approach is the right one or anything. I think we need greenland, but we should have just de facto taken it and done what we wanted there without saying much about it, instead of making a big show of "buying" it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49598806)

we just got BTFO by a bunch of sandniggers with the entire western world backing us. how the fuck would it be "easy" for us to take greenland when "WE" (i.e. the american people) don't support it, the rest of the west is 100% against, and we're talking about modern whites not 80iq browns with aks and ieds?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49598850)

This place is way lower IQ now than back when I started lurking.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49600183)

LMAO

Oh no, damn why didn't those faggot ass shitlibs over in Europe ever think of "prohibiting" right wing parties before and thereby stopping the slow but inexorable rise of neo-fascism in its tracks? I mean, all of the smart and educated people know that if you simply outlaw a political position, people will stop holding it!

*drools*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49598863)

they’re like “well I didn’t think he’d do THAT”

really low social IQs these people

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49597091)

What, exactly, is Europe going to "do" to stop us from taking Greenland? Initiate military action against us? Sanction us? Start a trade war? Strongly condemn our actions at the UN? Say a bunch of REALLY mean things about us on social media?

I would love to hear some of the shitlibs guffawing and smirking and shrieking ITT actually try to explain Europe's path to victory here in great detail.

Please be as specific as possible -- I'm very interested in learning more about all of the different ways that Europe will FUCK ARE ASS unless we listen to them and do what they want us to do. From the way you guys talk, it sounds like they must have quite a bit of power and leverage over us in 2026... so please lay our exactly what that roadmap looks like moving forward. TYIA.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49598869)

Damn... fair point re the Senate, it's too bad that a cursory review of the last century of American history proves that U.S. Presidents are unable to initiate direct offensive military action against another nation with first obtaining prior approval from Congress in the form of a formal declaration of war.

*blank stare*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49599258)

Vietnam: Not an island (can't be blockaded), population ~100,000,000.

Afghanistan: Not an island (can't be blockaded), population ~43,000,000.

Greenland: Island (can be blockaded), population ~57,000.

Did this analogy actually sound smart when you typed it out?

But actually, let's start here: Can you link to any contemporaneous POTUS statement that ever evinced any desire whatsoever to turn either Vietnam or Afghanistan into a permanent American territories? I'll wait while you dig those up.

(PS: while you're at it, also look up how we acquired Puerto Rico -- which is another island with a relatively small population that we actually *did* say that we wanted to turn into a permanent American territory, and which has now been firmly under our control for ~125 years.)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49599263)

*Shudders in horror*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49599316)

(Retard who apparently thinks that "Baffin Island" and Greenland are even remotely comparable in terms of their strategic value to American interests)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49599283)

Sorry brother, no offense but I'm familiar with your poasting and you're objectively an actual fucking retard and my limited and finite time on this Earth is too valuable at this point in my life to waste arguing with actual fucking retards about incredibly obvious shit on the internet.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49599300)

Right, that's a low-effort paraphrase of *my* request to liberals. But I'm not ITT taking questions, I'm asking them.

See the difference?

HTH!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5823265&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49599318)