RATE this LEGAL tweet re: AI conversations being privileged
| lake mood | 02/14/26 | | lake mood | 02/14/26 | | soul-stirring insanely creepy area | 02/14/26 | | lake mood | 02/14/26 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/14/26 | | Razzle Knife Theatre | 02/14/26 | | lake mood | 02/14/26 | | odious circlehead | 02/14/26 | | lilac persian | 02/14/26 | | provocative church building associate | 02/14/26 | | lilac persian | 02/14/26 | | arousing fishy forum | 02/14/26 | | lake mood | 02/14/26 | | lake mood | 02/14/26 | | lake mood | 02/14/26 | | Insecure bawdyhouse roommate | 02/14/26 | | ..;;.;;;;.;;..;.;;;;.;;..;;,;;,.... | 02/14/26 | | peeface | 02/14/26 | | norwood ultra | 02/14/26 | | Jack Johns | 02/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 14th, 2026 9:21 PM
Author: ..;;.;;;;.;;..;.;;;;.;;..;;,;;,....
why would any random person's notes or search history become privileged?
now the attorney's chatgpt and google history certainly should but because he is a lawyer with work product and client privilege
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5834938&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49671481) |
 |
Date: February 14th, 2026 10:26 PM Author: peeface
work product surprises me because it has protection in many situations even for unrepresented clients.
for privilege.. this has always struck me as slightly odd about it. the privilege belongs to the client, not to the attorney. and it developed to protect his right to fair legal process. why a similar principle never developed for the notes and research material of self-represented individuals is a bit of a puzzle.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5834938&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=3986969#49671600)
|
|
|