The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why it's fine to be pro-Shia in America in 2024
| https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr | 09/29/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 29th, 2024 4:20 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/IkQnGlr The fist thing to understand is the split, and what it's all about it. It's actually really simple:
1. There was a succession crises. Mohammed died young and unexpectedly (like Jesus!) without giving any clear instructions on what to do after he was det.
2. Mohamed himself seems like a pretty incredible dood, if the stories are to be believed. Seems like he was touched by Allah. Seems like his kids and shit would be special too. At the very least, they'd be part-Mohammed in some sense. Not like other people who weren't part of the tribe/clan.
3. Separately there were all these non-relatives of Mohammed who had held some authority in the kangdom. At best these people were the equivalent of SCOTUS justices who were appointed by Mohamed.
4. The people who were family of Mohamed went off and started their own religious tradition that was a continuation of the Mohamed project. These people split off into various clans, including one that landed in Persia.
5. The people who were like the SCOTUS justices tried to claim authority through their mastery of the law. However, they created an internal legal structure that makes it impossible to challenge a wide range of fundamental tenets. This is like having Roe v Wade being decided in 700AD, and being told that anyone who questions the validity of that decision will be put to death.
6. The "lawgiver" Muslims eventually devolved into bands of marauders who only wanted to live like rich kangz. They didn't give a fuck about Mohamed or any of that shit that happened 200 years ago. They only wanted to live in Damfuckingascus. At that time, Damfuckingascus was like MFH. You HAD to live there to be anybody important. However, Mohamed himself had never gone there, and Damascus had zero historical connection to Islamic tradition in any way.
7. These corrupt "lawgiver" Muslims, who never had any blood relation to Mohamed in the first place, and who got thoroughly corrupted and became infatuated with living Damfuckingascus, became the Umayyad Caliphate. For some reason they are the people modern day Sunnis seek to emulate. To this day they remain corrupt and wedded to 8th century laws, by choice. There were any number of caliphates they could have chosen to emulate, but none of them ever achieved the glory one could achieve by claiming Damfuckingascus as one's capital city in the 8th century.
8. Anyone would be rightly frightened by this shit. Persians didn't like it. Anyone who wasn't Arab basically hated living under these oppressive laws instituted by corrupt priests. So when a Shia conqueror (claiming blood relation to Mohamed) appeared, they were happy to convert. It was an opportunity for them to do all kinds of shit that violated these shitty ancient Sunni laws. If the Safavid kang wanted to overturn Roe v Wade he could do it.
9. That same logic still applies today. You can get into the brains of these Shia islamists and have a conversation with them. They won't play the shitlaw games Sunnis play, and don't carry the same level of cognitive dissonance by default. |