The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Sable hospital | 01/06/26 | | stubborn turdskin | 01/06/26 | | exhilarant plaza double fault | 01/06/26 | | stubborn turdskin | 01/06/26 | | exhilarant plaza double fault | 01/06/26 | | stubborn turdskin | 01/06/26 | | Sable hospital | 01/06/26 | | stubborn turdskin | 01/06/26 | | Sable hospital | 01/06/26 | | razzle khaki sound barrier ape | 01/07/26 | | mint nowag base | 01/06/26 | | Big marketing idea den | 01/06/26 | | exhilarant plaza double fault | 01/06/26 | | Honey-headed bearded station dragon | 01/06/26 | | exhilarant plaza double fault | 01/06/26 | | laughsome pearly lettuce | 01/06/26 | | swashbuckling crimson faggotry athletic conference | 01/06/26 | | Maroon kitty | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: stubborn turdskin
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4593694",#49568134) |
|
|