\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
Underhanded heady marketing idea
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
talking dragon cuck
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
Underhanded heady marketing idea
  11/29/25
...
provocative avocado hell legend
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
Mewling Peach Masturbator
  11/29/25
lol jfc
Underhanded heady marketing idea
  11/29/25
...
Amethyst fear-inspiring electric furnace dilemma
  11/29/25
wow
jet lay
  12/07/25
lmao
Lavender Insanely Creepy Trust Fund
  12/07/25
...
Amethyst fear-inspiring electric furnace dilemma
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
jet lay
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
salmon sinister cuckold
  12/07/25
Mental illness
arousing step-uncle's house travel guidebook
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
Razzmatazz round eye point
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
talking dragon cuck
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
Galvanic cocky space
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
provocative avocado hell legend
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: Underhanded heady marketing idea

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: talking dragon cuck

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: Underhanded heady marketing idea

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: provocative avocado hell legend



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: Mewling Peach Masturbator

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: Underhanded heady marketing idea

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: Amethyst fear-inspiring electric furnace dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: jet lay

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: Lavender Insanely Creepy Trust Fund

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: Amethyst fear-inspiring electric furnace dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: jet lay

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: salmon sinister cuckold

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: arousing step-uncle's house travel guidebook

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: Razzmatazz round eye point

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: talking dragon cuck

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: Galvanic cocky space

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: provocative avocado hell legend

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=4973486#49527743)