\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
flirting ungodly feces fat ankles
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
Bonkers Messiness National
  12/08/25
You know how
Razzle-dazzle Mad-dog Skullcap Pistol
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
flirting ungodly feces fat ankles
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
Soul-stirring mustard corn cake dilemma
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
flirting ungodly feces fat ankles
  12/08/25
...
Soul-stirring mustard corn cake dilemma
  12/08/25
180
Brindle aphrodisiac space skinny woman
  12/09/25
...
sticky obsidian genital piercing
  12/09/25
correct
Supple quadroon clown
  12/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: flirting ungodly feces fat ankles

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Bonkers Messiness National

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle Mad-dog Skullcap Pistol

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: flirting ungodly feces fat ankles

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: Soul-stirring mustard corn cake dilemma

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: flirting ungodly feces fat ankles

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: Soul-stirring mustard corn cake dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: Brindle aphrodisiac space skinny woman

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: sticky obsidian genital piercing



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: Supple quadroon clown

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5085026#49495777)