The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
SANDRA FLUKE: learn how to give BLOWJOBS plsthx
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 2nd, 2012 2:10 PM Author: chocolate mildly autistic party of the first part hominid can't get preggers that way
p.s. we'll buy you teh kneepads |
 |
Date: March 2nd, 2012 2:11 PM Author: cobalt razzle church building shitlib What about anal or handies? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20106056) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 2:13 PM Author: chocolate mildly autistic party of the first part hominid Also OK. But she just needs to remember to wash her hands after handies.
p.s. we'll buy her the kleenex |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 4:30 PM Author: emerald floppy boistinker (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107042) |
Date: March 2nd, 2012 2:13 PM Author: emerald floppy boistinker two subpoenas brother... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20106074) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 4:53 PM Author: chocolate mildly autistic party of the first part hominid LOL, STFU. Sandra K. Fluke is a PUBLIC FIGURE. It's not like we revealed her scorching case of HERPES or anything like that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107184) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 4:55 PM Author: Heady Casino Public figure? She's been in the news for a like a week. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107196) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:23 PM Author: bearded exciting becky den exactly, public figure, wtf? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107346) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:29 PM Author: emerald floppy boistinker This thread = more evidence that Peter North needs to be banned for his own good (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107366) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:31 PM Author: Transparent hospital pocket flask How about limited public figure for the purposes of talking about fucking (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107380) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:51 PM Author: Heady Casino Oh please. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107543) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:53 PM Author: Transparent hospital pocket flask what you seriously don't think so? what has to happen before she becomes one, she writes a book about this traumatic experience? people continue to talk about her for a year, maybe two? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107564) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:55 PM Author: Heady Casino Not sure. Just saying she isn't quite in the Cindy Sheehan tier yet. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107579) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:04 PM Author: Transparent hospital pocket flask okay, well if this question were before me I'd call her a limited public figure. the whole point of the public figure/non-public figure line is to not chill speech on matters of public concern, and discussing the sex life of this slore/feminist hero is, at the moment, the way in which a lot of retarded proles discuss issues of sexual ethics, contraception, free exercise, gender, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107648) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:05 PM Author: emerald floppy boistinker Peter you're still a fucktard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107656) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:08 PM Author: Transparent hospital pocket flask I'm not Peter. I borrowed this argument from some law review article, although I think I take it further than he did (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107674) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:09 PM Author: emerald floppy boistinker Yes, law review articles' reasoning will stand up in court in a defamation lawsuit, good call (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107685) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:10 PM Author: Transparent hospital pocket flask I'm not making a claim about what will stand up in court, I'm saying that this is what I'd recommend to my judge if we were writing the opinion. It's a mushy standard, there's a lot of room for idiosyncratic readings of it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#20107690) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:07 AM Author: Garnet meetinghouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#49504202) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:05 AM Author: territorial legal warrant (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5102164#49504198) |