13 NYT editorial board members only 1 thought Walz won
| bip | 10/02/24 | | which dad? | 10/02/24 | | Ass Sunstein | 10/02/24 | | bip | 10/02/24 | | one-letter moniker | 10/02/24 | | gtt | 10/02/24 | | world war 3 | 10/02/24 | | '"'''"'''"""" | 10/02/24 | | cannon | 10/02/24 | | world war 3 | 10/02/24 | | LathamTouchedMe | 10/02/24 | | gtt | 10/02/24 | | Charles Tyrwhitt Dad | 10/02/24 | | zarathustra | 10/02/24 | | cannon | 10/02/24 | | world war 3 | 10/02/24 | | which dad? | 10/02/24 | | Ass Sunstein | 10/02/24 | | bip | 10/02/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 2nd, 2024 9:47 AM Author: bip
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/02/opinion/vance-walz-debate-scorecard.html
Of course it's Charles M Blow the turbo woke negro. A couple of them scored Walz winning slightly but overall thought that debate was 'depressing'. I won't even count those. Majority thought Vance won and the debate was good.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5605115&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927",#48154299) |
Date: October 2nd, 2024 10:07 AM Author: LathamTouchedMe
polling so far: CNN 51-49 for Vance, CBS 42-41 for Vance.
Hardly a blowout. CNN favoribility numbers post-debate show a huge jump for Walz (women driving the jump). Vance is still underwater. One could easily say that Walz was the real winner.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5605115&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927",#48154391) |
|
Date: October 2nd, 2024 10:35 AM Author: Charles Tyrwhitt Dad
Latham has TDS. Ignores the WaPo poll showing 2/3 swing state said Vance won.
Pragmatically, the debate didn't flip anyone from Harris to Trump, but it accomplished two things:
1. It made the lean Trump but queasy about Trump's antics more comfortable in voting for Trump.
2. It destroyed the Dem fake meme hit jobs on Vance that was admittedly so successful. Now Vance has to be treated as a genuine article and political threat, not a meme joke.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5605115&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927",#48154510) |
Date: October 2nd, 2024 10:17 AM Author: zarathustra
lmao @ this shrieking:
Jamelle Bouie, Times columnist It’s a pretty straightforward verdict: Vance won this debate. It’s not hard to see why. He has spent most of his adult life selling himself to the wealthy, the powerful and the influential. He is as smooth and practiced as they come. He has no regard for the truth. He lies as easily as he breathes. We saw this throughout the debate. He told Americans that there are 20 million to 25 million “illegal aliens” — a lie. He told Americans that Mexico is responsible for the nation’s illegal gun problem — a lie. He told Americans that Trump actually tried to save the Affordable Care Act — a lie. If Vance had to sell the benefits of asbestos to win office, he would do it well and do it with a smile.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5605115&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927",#48154436) |
|
|