the ChatGPT summary of Jennifer Siebel Newsom's testimony is hilarious

The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.

the ChatGPT summary of Jennifer Siebel Newsom's testimony is hilarious

On cross-examination, Jennifer Siebel Newsom did not deny th...

Jennifer Siebel did Harvey Weinstein consensually

09/04/26

🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS acco...

lib quotemo = literally WLMAS = Dumb Nigger

09/04/26

🚨 this is a WLMAS account 🚨 🚨 this is a WLMAS acco...

lib quotemo = literally WLMAS = Dumb Nigger

09/04/26

Poast new message in this thread

Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2026 10:58 AM
Author: Jennifer Siebel did Harvey Weinstein consensually (Prestige Feuds)

On cross-examination, Jennifer Siebel Newsom did not deny that she had sent friendly, professional emails to Weinstein after the alleged assault. Instead, she offered several explanations for why she did so.

Her main explanations were:

She was trying to advance her career. She testified that the emails were "just business" and that she was probably seeking advice or networking opportunities. When asked why she invited meetings over coffee or lunch, she said, "It was just business."
She was "networking" and "hustling." Confronted with emails asking Weinstein to meet at the Toronto and Cannes film festivals, she acknowledged sending them and told the jury, "I was just hustling."
She compartmentalized the alleged assault. She testified that she had put what happened "in a box" and tried to continue her career despite the trauma. She explained, "I felt tremendous shame... I was just playing the game, I was just pretending like nothing happened and putting that in a box... and moving on with my career."
She said she was "just surviving." When defense counsel argued that a rape victim would not send cordial emails to her alleged attacker, she responded that the communications were an unfortunate necessity for a young actress trying to work in Hollywood: "I was just surviving."

The defense argued that these explanations were not credible. Weinstein's attorney highlighted emails in which she:

asked to meet Weinstein for coffee or lunch,
sought him out at the Cannes Film Festival,
and even emailed him in 2007 seeking advice about handling media during a political scandal involving Gavin Newsom.

The prosecution, by contrast, argued that maintaining contact with an alleged assailant is not uncommon and can occur for a variety of psychological and practical reasons, particularly when there is a significant power imbalance in a professional setting. The jury ultimately heard both interpretations but did not reach a unanimous verdict on the charges involving Siebel Newsom.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900518&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#50115405)