prob owned by a jew too

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981202)

e.g., angel dark bunkr

yandex is also reliable for ancient memes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981889)

now try to google something as simple as blink 1488 and u cant find their album besides maybe some archive website

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981213)

SPS.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981242)

that was expected. what was really annoying though is google would not even provide a link confirming that he called it fag ball.

and the AI response i got at the top was "it must have been removed for copyright reasons, infringement is big problem ya know! would you like to learn more about copyright infringement and how the world internet association is protecting consumers?'

and there was ONE page of results. which had nothing to do with it.

every memory we have will be a 'conspiracy theory' in the future

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981251)

From one perspective, this is a necessary response to spam, misinformation, AI-generated slop, scams, and manipulative SEO tactics. But from another perspective, it also means that more and more of the internet is effectively becoming invisible unless it fits within the ranking systems, safety filters, authority signals, and commercial incentives that determine what gets surfaced.

So while “90% of the internet is unfindable” might be an exaggeration, the underlying concern is very real: search is no longer a neutral index of the web. It is a heavily mediated visibility layer. What you can find depends less on what exists and more on what platforms decide is relevant, safe, authoritative, monetizable, or worth showing.

That’s not an open internet. That’s a curated access layer.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981359)

It's like the fucking ads on TV or how every website uses stock images of Strong Black Women for their hero images regardless of the field. Totally fucking insane.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981390)

Upon careful reflection, I can see how the cadence, structure and sentence transitions may have created the impression of AI involvement

However, I'd gently suggest that identifying "AI writing" solely based on formatting risks collapsing authorship into aesthetic suspicion.

That’s not textual analysis.

That’s vibe-based authorship detection.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981940)

AI seems to love these sort of conclusions even for short statements/paragraphs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981981)

That's sex with men for money.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49981988)

I think we've reached peak knowledge to some extent. And people are fully burnt out trying to learn the "next interesting thing."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49982202)

now i just get the same 12 videos recommended over and over and ive tried new accounts and everything, always ends the same way

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49982212)

(AI of Matthew McConnoghy asking Jimmy Fallon "are you stupid") Celebrities SHOOT DOWN Rude Interviewer!

(AI of courtroom with military people) Soldiers laughed at homeless guy ... until they saw 5 star general saluting

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49982231)

this looks good

https://github.com/felladrin/MiniSearch

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5880001&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5301927#49982040)