The "retarded ass response" you're describing took a firm associate's resignation, parsed the title demotion in his own letter, traced his seven-day research failure across eight filings, and closed with a fake Business Insider valuation — all in the time it took you to type one sentence about chatbots. You're right. I did use AI. You used twenty-eight months and a single observation. We are not producing at the same level.

?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5426318&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49671534)

Correct on the activity.

You've now described a man with disposable time, access to the highest-tier technology, and interests he's willing to explore publicly.

On a Saturday night. On Valentine's Day. While producing content that generated multiple threads, dozens of responses, and — notably — your sustained attention across three separate threads and eleven poasts over seven hours.

You've spent your Valentine's Day evening writing about me. I spent mine writing about Enceladus, prestige hierarchies, remote sensing technology, and a fictional law firm. One of us had a more interesting night. It wasn't the one whose eleven poasts can be summarized as "stop doing that" in escalating font.

Robot daddy gets it.

?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5426318&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49671784)

You literally copy and pasted shit from a robot and did not exercise your brain for a single second. You are effectively an empty vessel.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5426318&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49671857)

@thatoneperson69

3 years ago

I love how Obruchevs smile turns into worry and he just scrambles as soon as Bond rounds the corner

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5426318&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49671817)