XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/04/25 | | Arousing National | 07/04/25 | | hideous juggernaut gas station | 07/04/25 | | at-the-ready hall | 07/04/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/04/25 | | internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete | 07/04/25 | | Arousing National | 07/04/25 | | internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete | 07/04/25 | | Arousing National | 07/04/25 | | internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete | 07/04/25 | | Arousing National | 07/05/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/05/25 | | laughsome hateful menage | 07/05/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/06/25 | | laughsome hateful menage | 07/05/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/05/25 | | laughsome hateful menage | 07/06/25 | | cyan church | 07/06/25 | | grizzly hell chad | 07/05/25 | | Crusty Ruddy Tanning Salon | 07/06/25 | | grizzly hell chad | 07/06/25 | | internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete | 07/06/25 | | grizzly hell chad | 07/06/25 | | internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete | 07/06/25 | | brass gunner | 07/05/25 | | Rusted Background Story | 07/06/25 | | Pearly kitty cat | 07/05/25 | | passionate lilac police squad | 07/06/25 | | internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete | 07/06/25 | | Rebellious resort | 07/06/25 | | internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete | 07/06/25 | | 180 lemon native people who are hurt | 07/06/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/06/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/06/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/06/25 | | cyan church | 07/06/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/06/25 | | Crusty Ruddy Tanning Salon | 07/06/25 | | Mint Fighting Rehab | 07/06/25 | | Rebellious resort | 07/06/25 | | Rusted Background Story | 07/06/25 | | internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete | 07/06/25 | | Stimulating Bearded Kitchen Reading Party | 07/06/25 | | curious generalized bond | 07/06/25 | | spectacular business firm regret | 07/06/25 | | curious generalized bond | 07/06/25 | | walnut dilemma digit ratio | 07/06/25 | | grizzly hell chad | 07/06/25 | | Pink point knife | 07/06/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: internet-worthy aromatic nibblets keepsake machete
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: passionate lilac police squad
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: cyan church
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Rusted Background Story
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49076800) |
|
|