some quotes from an older thread:

"The practice of competitive sport itself can have homoerotic dimensions: the contact of the playing field, the spectacle of the partially clad body, the steamy environment of the showers and locker room...I argued that men's sport allows men and boys to exclude women and girls from their all-male environments, permits them to play with each other's bodies, to surround themselves with naked men in the showers and locker cooms, to enjoy that all-male contact, without suffering the vilification that usually comes from the open acknowledgment and pursuit of masculine erotic contact, the stigma of "being homosexual.""

---------------------------------------------------------------

"It goes without saying that a limp, shriveled penis is not effective in simulating the domineering masculine organization of desire. Given that no penis can live up to its phallic boast, no matter how swollen it gets, phallocentrism finds other ways to territorialize the body: innocuously, possibly, in body building, and more despotically in the territorial violence of warfare and competitive sport, for instance."

--------------------------------------------------------------

"When, in the context of the philosophy of the limit, we consider the conventional pleasures of sport...we see the simulation of desire in the territorial project that transforms the puissance of the human connection into a pouvoir of dominance and submission. Competitive sport, therefore is a profoundly unethical way to organize desire."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1890215&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#22024215)

--------------------------------------------------------------

"I will argue that competitive sport... is embedded in the masculine colonizing will to conquer the space of an "other" while simultaneously protectively enclosing the space of the self... In sex, it shows in the desire to penetrate the holes of others and the desire to resist having the same happen to oneself."

--------------------------------------------------------------

"Less boastful than the phallus, perhaps because of its embarrassing vulnerability or even more terrifying potential openness, is the phallus's companion, the protective side of phallic desire, the side than can repel or admit others into the space carved out by phallic aggression.

The simulacrum of this other side of phallic desire, I suggest is the asshole. It is the tightly closed orifice of the phallic conqueror, as well as the (perhaps) reluctantly opened orifice of the phalically conquered. Masculine desire is thus produced in the play of the phallus and asshole.

It stimulates desire as both homoerotic and homophobic: homoerotic in its preoccupation with phallic intent, homophobic in its resistance to penetration."

--------------------------------------------------------------

"Since one's participation in competition indicates one's commitment to phallic potency and one's defeat shows one's anal vulnerability and therefore phallic impotence, there is humiliation in defeat, in being penetrated by one's competitor."

--------------------------------------------------------------

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1890215&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#22704100)

(guy w/ boring sex life)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1890215&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#23239370)

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=16768387556061240534&as_sdt=5,44&sciodt=0,44&hl=en

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1890215&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#42892809)

pretty insane obit lol'd at "To be around Brian was always to feel his spark, his deep pleasure in life" and that he leaves "his tight and beloved circle"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1890215&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5307129#49614747)