\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
galvanic bearded range
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
Mint ratface stage
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
galvanic bearded range
  11/29/25
...
Concupiscible nubile parlour
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
Razzle-dazzle hyperactive lodge stock car
  11/29/25
lol jfc
galvanic bearded range
  11/29/25
...
nighttime heady office marketing idea
  11/29/25
wow
Glittery Pervert
  12/07/25
lmao
Ivory institution stain
  12/07/25
...
nighttime heady office marketing idea
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
Glittery Pervert
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
Charismatic sable trailer park
  12/07/25
Mental illness
Adventurous internet-worthy house
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
Irradiated brunch
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
Mint ratface stage
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
big stage
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
Concupiscible nubile parlour
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: galvanic bearded range

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: Mint ratface stage

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: galvanic bearded range

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: Concupiscible nubile parlour



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: Razzle-dazzle hyperactive lodge stock car

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: galvanic bearded range

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: nighttime heady office marketing idea



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Glittery Pervert

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: Ivory institution stain

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: nighttime heady office marketing idea



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: Glittery Pervert

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: Charismatic sable trailer park

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: Adventurous internet-worthy house

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: Irradiated brunch

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: Mint ratface stage

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: big stage

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: Concupiscible nubile parlour

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49527743)