\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Opus 4.5 is disgustingly good

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to...
sticky casino pozpig
  11/29/25
The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model ...
Pale spectacular orchestra pit doctorate
  11/29/25
yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit...
sticky casino pozpig
  11/29/25
...
Titillating Fanboi Lay
  11/29/25
My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP mode...
Crimson gaping abode
  11/29/25
lol jfc
sticky casino pozpig
  11/29/25
...
Diverse saffron lodge
  11/29/25
wow
Milky stimulating locale pervert
  12/07/25
lmao
Tripping Parlor Crotch
  12/07/25
...
Diverse saffron lodge
  11/30/25
it truly is insane - what a gift
Milky stimulating locale pervert
  12/07/25
explain what cause you to reach this conclusion
Elite station newt
  12/07/25
Mental illness
exciting salmon school cafeteria legal warrant
  12/07/25
I need an AI agent to work with
electric pontificating feces tanning salon
  12/07/25
Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time ho...
Pale spectacular orchestra pit doctorate
  12/21/25
People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a ...
Disgusting tan cuckoldry principal's office
  12/21/25
They are always claiming this for new model releases and no ...
Titillating Fanboi Lay
  12/21/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: sticky casino pozpig

Pretty sure humans are effectively useless now other than to pilot AI systems

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470203)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 1:37 PM
Author: Pale spectacular orchestra pit doctorate

The level of improvement from Sonnet 4.5 is insane (a model that is a couple months old). LLM progress isn’t really slowing down in a meaningful way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470302)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:10 PM
Author: sticky casino pozpig

yeah and whats also interesting is that sonnet 4.5 was legit good..like it was better than opus 4.1 for most things and competitive with gpt5. I still like gpt 5.1 and the 5 pro api best as a generalist but opus 4.5 is insane for coding and also its much better at critiquing something you give it. the other LLMs are still too nice, but it has no problem giving harsh criticism and arguing against you. GPT 5.1 is better than 5 for this but still a bit weak compared to claude

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470392)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:12 PM
Author: Titillating Fanboi Lay



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470405)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:13 PM
Author: Crimson gaping abode

My retarded fucking company refuses to upgrade our GHCP models from gpt4o and I want to kill myself

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470410)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:49 PM
Author: sticky casino pozpig

lol jfc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470540)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 29th, 2025 2:50 PM
Author: Diverse saffron lodge



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49470543)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Milky stimulating locale pervert

wow

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491040)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:32 AM
Author: Tripping Parlor Crotch

lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491074)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 30th, 2025 1:14 AM
Author: Diverse saffron lodge



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49471468)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:19 AM
Author: Milky stimulating locale pervert

it truly is insane - what a gift

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491048)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:23 AM
Author: Elite station newt

explain what cause you to reach this conclusion

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491063)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:50 AM
Author: exciting salmon school cafeteria legal warrant

Mental illness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491106)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 10:44 AM
Author: electric pontificating feces tanning salon

I need an AI agent to work with

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49491097)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 12:59 PM
Author: Pale spectacular orchestra pit doctorate

Opus 4.5 is up to 4 hours and 49 minutes on the METR time horizon task. this benchmark measures the task length (in terms of human work time) that models can do with SWE/AI research type projects. big increase over 5.1 max, which was 2 hours 53 minutes and faster than the overall trend of doubling every 7 months. with any luck, models will be capable of substantially automating AI research before 2030 and set off an intelligence explosion.

https://metr.org/blog/2025-03-19-measuring-ai-ability-to-complete-long-tasks/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49527643)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:47 PM
Author: Disgusting tan cuckoldry principal's office

People complaining that 4.5 was shadow throttled starting a few days ago

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49527733)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 21st, 2025 1:53 PM
Author: Titillating Fanboi Lay

They are always claiming this for new model releases and no objective evidence ever materializes for it. It’s almost certainly a psychological bias rather than reality. There is substantial variation in how models respond to a particular problem just based on how they are prompted. It’s hard for a user to reliably measure model capabilities over time based on intuition alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5804093&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49527743)