The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Renée is getting a gold coffin
| sepia alcoholic menage windowlicker | 01/10/26 |
| vivacious disrespectful hospital | 01/10/26 |
| sepia alcoholic menage windowlicker | 01/10/26 |
| vivacious disrespectful hospital | 01/10/26 |
| sepia alcoholic menage windowlicker | 01/10/26 |
| stirring idiotic knife stag film | 01/10/26 |
| spruce buck-toothed idiot keepsake machete | 01/10/26 |
| crawly range | 01/10/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 10th, 2026 1:43 PM Author: sepia alcoholic menage windowlicker LJL https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1239_onjq.pdf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49578867) |
Date: January 10th, 2026 1:57 PM Author: vivacious disrespectful hospital Most notable here, the “totality of the circumstances” inquiry has no time limit. While the situation at the precise time of the shooting will often matter most, earlier facts and circumstances may bear on how a reasonable officer would have understood and responded to later ones. Prior events may show why a reasonable officer would perceive otherwise ambiguous conduct as threatening, or instead as innocuous. Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U. S. 765, well illustrates this point. There, an officer’s use of deadly force was justified “at the moment” partly because of what had transpired in the preceding period. Id., at 777.
==== so the general conduct of the MN protestors creating threats to ICE is relevant as is the conduct of the two women in the Honda Pilot. helps the officer, right? |
 |
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:46 PM Author: sepia alcoholic menage windowlicker Yes, it makes his decision to walk in front of the vehicle in violation of policy and training (while of course engaging in an arrest without reasonable suspicion) even more extreme and therefore weighs heavily against qualified immunity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49578975) |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: vivacious disrespectful hospital not sure i buy that analysis. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49578985) |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:54 PM Author: sepia alcoholic menage windowlicker A United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota will disagree. Either that or they will decide that it's irrelevant - unlikely because more open to appeal - or that the protestors did nothing. You can quote me on this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49578989) |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: stirring idiotic knife stag film "The driver may be drunk, on drugs, armed, or some combination thereof. Or the driver may have committed (or may be about to commit) a serious crime."
wow
"Drivers," and place-goers generally, are a bunch of scumbags. |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 3:00 PM Author: spruce buck-toothed idiot keepsake machete It’s funny how every pencil neck lawyer on this board thinks it’s still 2010.
Whatever happens here, no one is getting paid a nickel. |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 3:03 PM Author: crawly range Not according to your link. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5309378#49579011) |