Date: July 1st, 2026 8:18 PM
Author: Hairraiser vengeful range
In mammals, the main cause of release or accumulation of polyamines such as putrescine and cadaverine is amino-acid decarboxylation, usually driven by microbial decomposition or by cellular polyamine metabolism.
The distinction matters:
In living mammalian cells, putrescine is mainly produced by the enzyme ornithine decarboxylase, which decarboxylates ornithine. Putrescine is then used to synthesize higher polyamines such as spermidine and spermine. These molecules support cell growth, DNA/RNA stabilization, translation, and tissue repair. Cadaverine is less central in normal mammalian metabolism and is more associated with microbial activity.
After tissue damage, infection, gut microbial activity, or death, bacteria produce large amounts of putrescine and cadaverine by decarboxylating amino acids:
Putrescine comes mainly from ornithine or indirectly from arginine.
Cadaverine comes mainly from lysine.
So the main cause, especially when people refer to “release” of putrescine and cadaverine as odor-associated compounds, is bacterial breakdown of proteins and amino acids, particularly during putrefaction. That is why these compounds are strongly associated with decay, necrotic tissue, infection, fecal material, and decomposing bodies.
Operationally:
Protein breakdown → free amino acids → bacterial decarboxylation → polyamines.
The biochemical cause is decarboxylation; the ecological/physiological driver is usually microbial decomposition or dysbiosis-associated metabolism.
--
so basically the same thing that causes PUTREFACTION in CADAVERS?
--
Yes — for putrescine and cadaverine specifically, largely yes.
They are classic products of putrefaction, especially after death, when bacteria break down proteins and decarboxylate amino acids:
lysine → cadaverine
ornithine → putrescine
That is why their names are so evocative: cadaverine is associated with cadavers, and putrescine with putrefaction.
The caveat is that putrescine is also a normal mammalian metabolite in living cells. Mammals make it enzymatically for growth, repair, and polyamine synthesis. So the presence of putrescine alone does not necessarily mean decay.
But when you see putrescine plus cadaverine, especially with foul odor, tissue breakdown, necrosis, infection, fecal contamination, or postmortem change, then yes: the same basic process is involved — microbial decomposition of amino-acid-rich tissue.
So the clean version is:
In cadavers: bacterial putrefaction is the dominant source.
In living mammals: normal cells make some polyamines, but large odor-associated releases usually point to bacterial decomposition, infection, necrosis, or gut microbial metabolism.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5879070&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310074#49974698)