The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Spruce mental disorder | 01/06/26 | | Slate brethren | 01/06/26 | | Ungodly Associate Indian Lodge | 01/06/26 | | Slate brethren | 01/06/26 | | Ungodly Associate Indian Lodge | 01/06/26 | | Slate brethren | 01/06/26 | | Spruce mental disorder | 01/06/26 | | Slate brethren | 01/06/26 | | Spruce mental disorder | 01/06/26 | | Contagious Pontificating Bawdyhouse Digit Ratio | 01/07/26 | | outnumbered hell | 01/06/26 | | diverse poppy azn | 01/06/26 | | Ungodly Associate Indian Lodge | 01/06/26 | | fluffy half-breed | 01/06/26 | | Ungodly Associate Indian Lodge | 01/06/26 | | aquamarine brunch filthpig | 01/06/26 | | Cerebral henna affirmative action | 01/06/26 | | sooty doctorate resort | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: Slate brethren
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310074#49568134) |
|
|