"Defendants cite Williams v. Wong, 112 F.3d 333 (D. Wisc. 1992) for the proposition that my client will not win, buteven though they wrote like a fucking paragraph about it they left out that Plaintiff (loser) in that case was AZNmale. LOL are you fucking serious? NO SHIT he lost he barely has a cock JFC. Cf. Williams v. Bernstein, 23 Fed. App'x 432, 455 (9th Cir) (affirming Jew win)"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2841865&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310363",#27578341)

"WHEREAS, Conusel for Plaintiff was also drunk inthe club all nght repatedly throughout the last several months tryin to rape some bitchs and could not even get a fucking worthless AZNgirl to giv him a handjob in the fucking bathroom;

THEREFORE, the Parties now stipulate to the following Proposed Scheduling Order:"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2841865&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310363",#27578370)

"In summary, this is horseshit opp and Opposing counsel is a fucking KIKE just billing his clients up the ass opposing this. Fuck that shit. Opposing counsel willdeny, but Attached hereto as 'Exhibit A' is a true and correct copy of my current Mint.com balance (reflecting 7 years of salary paid by KIKE BIGLAW firm for fraduelnt billing shit so I know what I'm talking about NIGGA)."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2841865&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310363",#27578397)

"TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.........................1

STATEMENT OF FACTS.....................3

ARGUMENT.............................10

>I. Under Fifth Circuit Precedent, The "Ex Post" Doctrine Does Not Bar Amendation Of The Governing Contract In This Case................................10

>II. In The Alternative, American Common Law (Derived From Euro Common Law) Is BULLSHIT...........13

>>a. Europe was TOTAL SHIT before 1500.....13

>>b. Europeans barely invented SHIT.......16

>>c. Greeks aren't even really WHITE.....18

>>d. FUCK WHITEY.......................19

CONCLUSION.............................29

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2841865&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310363",#27578437)

well done

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2841865&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310363",#27779171)

"...Plantiff Motion for Sanctions should also be denied, in the alternative, because I'm actually broke as fuck. I liv in fucking Pattaya NIGGA, why the fuck do you think that is? BIGLAW $$$ for 6 fucking yrs but fucking livin in Ameikka took all that shit, should hav eleft 10 years earlier FUCKKKK.

Attached hereto as 'Exhibit C' is a REAL COPY of my REAL Mint.com printout (plz disregard previously attached 'Exhibit A' to Dkt. 103 reflecting a net worth of $387,412.14, which was not accurate)."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2841865&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310363",#27578492)

"Read fucking Rule 30. Do you even practice in Federal Ct? This faggot doesn't know what the fuck he's doing, and his client is also a bitch who needs to get FUCKED. I fucking miss BIGLAW sometimes because even if the Jews stole all ut shit and whipped you like WHITEY, at least they knew the fckin rules before thy broke them. FTGE forever FUCK. See also, e.g., Jameson v. Ind. R.R. Co., et al., 71 F.3d 122, 124-26 (affirming)."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2841865&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310363",#27578513)

lmao lost it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2841865&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310363",#27578714)