XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| deep area | 07/04/25 | | Plum Liquid Oxygen Pit | 07/04/25 | | stubborn keepsake machete indian lodge | 07/04/25 | | dark personal credit line | 07/04/25 | | deep area | 07/04/25 | | supple hot dingle berry becky | 07/04/25 | | Plum Liquid Oxygen Pit | 07/04/25 | | supple hot dingle berry becky | 07/04/25 | | Plum Liquid Oxygen Pit | 07/04/25 | | supple hot dingle berry becky | 07/04/25 | | Plum Liquid Oxygen Pit | 07/05/25 | | deep area | 07/05/25 | | Mewling Cruise Ship | 07/05/25 | | deep area | 07/06/25 | | Mewling Cruise Ship | 07/05/25 | | deep area | 07/05/25 | | Mewling Cruise Ship | 07/06/25 | | startled appetizing pocket flask abode | 07/06/25 | | Umber Curious Hall Macaca | 07/05/25 | | Cream Hairraiser Gaping Resort | 07/06/25 | | Umber Curious Hall Macaca | 07/06/25 | | supple hot dingle berry becky | 07/06/25 | | Umber Curious Hall Macaca | 07/06/25 | | supple hot dingle berry becky | 07/06/25 | | Violent Party Of The First Part Boltzmann | 07/05/25 | | Vibrant frozen public bath | 07/06/25 | | Copper stimulating kitchen double fault | 07/05/25 | | Sable plaza | 07/06/25 | | supple hot dingle berry becky | 07/06/25 | | lemon range | 07/06/25 | | supple hot dingle berry becky | 07/06/25 | | histrionic lettuce field | 07/06/25 | | deep area | 07/06/25 | | deep area | 07/06/25 | | deep area | 07/06/25 | | startled appetizing pocket flask abode | 07/06/25 | | deep area | 07/06/25 | | Cream Hairraiser Gaping Resort | 07/06/25 | | deep area | 07/06/25 | | lemon range | 07/06/25 | | Vibrant frozen public bath | 07/06/25 | | supple hot dingle berry becky | 07/06/25 | | Arousing piazza rigor | 07/06/25 | | slap-happy glittery theater coldplay fan | 07/06/25 | | Charcoal abnormal dilemma sound barrier | 07/06/25 | | slap-happy glittery theater coldplay fan | 07/06/25 | | Pink Mischievous Wagecucks | 07/06/25 | | Umber Curious Hall Macaca | 07/06/25 | | haunting french casino | 07/06/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: supple hot dingle berry becky
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310443#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: supple hot dingle berry becky
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310443#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: supple hot dingle berry becky
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310443#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: supple hot dingle berry becky
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310443#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Sable plaza
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310443#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: startled appetizing pocket flask abode
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310443#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Vibrant frozen public bath
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310443#49076800) |
|
|