The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
SANDRA FLUKE: learn how to give BLOWJOBS plsthx
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 2nd, 2012 2:10 PM Author: Violent crystalline cuckold pocket flask can't get preggers that way
p.s. we'll buy you teh kneepads |
 |
Date: March 2nd, 2012 2:11 PM Author: charismatic hairless hall new version What about anal or handies? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20106056) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 2:13 PM Author: Violent crystalline cuckold pocket flask Also OK. But she just needs to remember to wash her hands after handies.
p.s. we'll buy her the kleenex |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 4:30 PM Author: buff knife (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107042) |
Date: March 2nd, 2012 2:13 PM Author: buff knife two subpoenas brother... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20106074) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 4:53 PM Author: Violent crystalline cuckold pocket flask LOL, STFU. Sandra K. Fluke is a PUBLIC FIGURE. It's not like we revealed her scorching case of HERPES or anything like that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107184) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 4:55 PM Author: Impertinent Institution Idea He Suggested Public figure? She's been in the news for a like a week. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107196) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:23 PM Author: obsidian boyish tanning salon jap exactly, public figure, wtf? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107346) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:29 PM Author: buff knife This thread = more evidence that Peter North needs to be banned for his own good (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107366) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:31 PM Author: fragrant iridescent theatre faggotry How about limited public figure for the purposes of talking about fucking (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107380) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:51 PM Author: Impertinent Institution Idea He Suggested Oh please. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107543) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:53 PM Author: fragrant iridescent theatre faggotry what you seriously don't think so? what has to happen before she becomes one, she writes a book about this traumatic experience? people continue to talk about her for a year, maybe two? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107564) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 5:55 PM Author: Impertinent Institution Idea He Suggested Not sure. Just saying she isn't quite in the Cindy Sheehan tier yet. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107579) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:04 PM Author: fragrant iridescent theatre faggotry okay, well if this question were before me I'd call her a limited public figure. the whole point of the public figure/non-public figure line is to not chill speech on matters of public concern, and discussing the sex life of this slore/feminist hero is, at the moment, the way in which a lot of retarded proles discuss issues of sexual ethics, contraception, free exercise, gender, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107648) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:05 PM Author: buff knife Peter you're still a fucktard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107656) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:08 PM Author: fragrant iridescent theatre faggotry I'm not Peter. I borrowed this argument from some law review article, although I think I take it further than he did (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107674) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:09 PM Author: buff knife Yes, law review articles' reasoning will stand up in court in a defamation lawsuit, good call (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107685) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2012 6:10 PM Author: fragrant iridescent theatre faggotry I'm not making a claim about what will stand up in court, I'm saying that this is what I'd recommend to my judge if we were writing the opinion. It's a mushy standard, there's a lot of room for idiosyncratic readings of it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#20107690) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:07 AM Author: swashbuckling church building (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49504202) |
|
Date: December 12th, 2025 11:05 AM Author: 180 puce goyim (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1888427&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49504198) |