What is James Comey thinking right now?
| geriatric naked faggotry party of the first part | 11/09/16 | | excitant black woman stead | 11/09/16 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 11/24/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 11/24/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 11/24/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 11/24/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 11/26/25 | | copper electric candlestick maker | 11/26/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 11/26/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 11/27/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 11/27/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 12/01/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 12/02/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 12/03/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 12/04/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 12/05/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 12/07/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 12/08/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 12/10/25 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 01/11/26 | | Ruddy trump supporter | 01/12/26 | | supple toilet seat sandwich | 01/12/26 | | nyuug | 01/14/26 | | talking passionate home doctorate | 11/24/25 | | slate thriller juggernaut stag film | 11/26/25 | | supple toilet seat sandwich | 11/27/25 | | cracking fiercely-loyal legend | 11/24/25 | | copper electric candlestick maker | 11/26/25 | | Startled headpube | 01/12/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: November 27th, 2025 10:35 PM Author: supple toilet seat sandwich
No. The Judge addressed this in the order of dismissal:
Generally, “[t]he return of an indictment tolls the statute of limitations on the charges contained in the indictment.” United States v. Ojedokun, 16 F.4th 1091, 1109 (4th Cir. 2021). “An invalid indictment,” however, “cannot serve to block the door of limitations as it swings closed.” United States v. Crysopt Corp., 781 F. Supp. 375, 378 (D. Md. 1991) (emphasis in original); see also United States v. Gillespie, 666 F. Supp. 1137, 1141 (N.D. Ill. 1987) (“[A] valid indictment insulates from statute-of-limitations problems any refiling of the same charges during the pendency of that valid indictment (that is, the superseding of a valid indictment). But if the earlier indictment is void, there is no legitimate peg on which to hang such a judicial limitations-tolling result.” (emphasis in original)).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3419727&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49466883) |
|
|