\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
stirring up-to-no-good love of her life parlour
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
sapphire titillating goal in life
  12/08/25
You know how
Orange spectacular prole
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
stirring up-to-no-good love of her life parlour
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
Bonkers marvelous gas station patrolman
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
stirring up-to-no-good love of her life parlour
  12/08/25
...
Bonkers marvelous gas station patrolman
  12/08/25
180
Glittery stead french chef
  12/09/25
...
chestnut boyish rehab half-breed
  12/09/25
correct
light cuck crotch
  12/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: stirring up-to-no-good love of her life parlour

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: sapphire titillating goal in life

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Orange spectacular prole

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: stirring up-to-no-good love of her life parlour

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: Bonkers marvelous gas station patrolman

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: stirring up-to-no-good love of her life parlour

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: Bonkers marvelous gas station patrolman



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: Glittery stead french chef

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: chestnut boyish rehab half-breed



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: light cuck crotch

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49495777)