XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| supple tanning salon | 07/04/25 | | Onyx bearded library | 07/04/25 | | Glittery apoplectic state | 07/04/25 | | up-to-no-good elite university bbw | 07/04/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/04/25 | | Peach aromatic location | 07/04/25 | | Onyx bearded library | 07/04/25 | | Peach aromatic location | 07/04/25 | | Onyx bearded library | 07/04/25 | | Peach aromatic location | 07/04/25 | | Onyx bearded library | 07/05/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/05/25 | | Cerebral pale brunch | 07/05/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | Cerebral pale brunch | 07/05/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/05/25 | | Cerebral pale brunch | 07/06/25 | | bonkers anal property | 07/06/25 | | Iridescent Theater Stage | 07/05/25 | | Painfully honest corner party of the first part | 07/06/25 | | Iridescent Theater Stage | 07/06/25 | | Peach aromatic location | 07/06/25 | | Iridescent Theater Stage | 07/06/25 | | Peach aromatic location | 07/06/25 | | Trip hilarious stain range | 07/05/25 | | Curious Set | 07/06/25 | | soul-stirring drunken azn center | 07/05/25 | | medicated provocative hell ceo | 07/06/25 | | Peach aromatic location | 07/06/25 | | Godawful Stag Film Sweet Tailpipe | 07/06/25 | | Peach aromatic location | 07/06/25 | | Cowardly Kitchen | 07/06/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | bonkers anal property | 07/06/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | Painfully honest corner party of the first part | 07/06/25 | | supple tanning salon | 07/06/25 | | Godawful Stag Film Sweet Tailpipe | 07/06/25 | | Curious Set | 07/06/25 | | Peach aromatic location | 07/06/25 | | Brass dashing house marketing idea | 07/06/25 | | Underhanded Exciting Wagecucks Puppy | 07/06/25 | | dull beta menage | 07/06/25 | | Underhanded Exciting Wagecucks Puppy | 07/06/25 | | Excitant violent point | 07/06/25 | | Iridescent Theater Stage | 07/06/25 | | motley senate | 07/06/25 | | Mainlining the $ecret Truth of the Univer$e | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: Peach aromatic location
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: Peach aromatic location
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: Peach aromatic location
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: Peach aromatic location
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: medicated provocative hell ceo
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: bonkers anal property
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Curious Set
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49076800) |
|
|