The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| pink queen of the night | 01/06/26 | | slap-happy parlour | 01/06/26 | | cerebral brethren school | 01/06/26 | | slap-happy parlour | 01/06/26 | | cerebral brethren school | 01/06/26 | | slap-happy parlour | 01/06/26 | | pink queen of the night | 01/06/26 | | slap-happy parlour | 01/06/26 | | pink queen of the night | 01/06/26 | | excitant wagecucks | 01/07/26 | | Pungent dashing associate | 01/06/26 | | Thriller goal in life | 01/06/26 | | cerebral brethren school | 01/06/26 | | pale twinkling uncleanness wrinkle | 01/06/26 | | cerebral brethren school | 01/06/26 | | boyish tantric corner | 01/06/26 | | Gold Wonderful Hall | 01/06/26 | | Vigorous charcoal church weed whacker | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: slap-happy parlour
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49568134) |
|
|