The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Alito EVISCERATES shitlib atty in oral arguments re: trannies (link)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:09 PM Author: buff parlor ceo https://x.com/ericldaugh/status/2011117884270084281?s=61 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586439) |
 |
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:42 PM Author: multi-colored garnet telephone dilemma nobody cares what that dumb WOP DAGO thinks about anything. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586697) |
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:12 PM Author: Sooty home partner Both the attorney and Alito seem stupid in this exchange. No one making these policies, and no one who fights against these policies, thinks that a boy saying "lol i'm trans now" makes them trans. But both the attorney and Alito are taking the opposition position.
It's not discrimination against transgender people unless the people are transgender.
This used to be a forum for smart people, and this error is glaringly obvious. I'm pretty disappointed. Why the fuck do I still post, it's just divorcés, unemployed, suicidal, losers with fat mantits, and morons |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:20 PM Author: Razzmatazz locale mental disorder "No one making these policies, and no one who fights against these policies, thinks that a boy saying "lol i'm trans now" makes them trans."
are you rejecting the self-identification standard for trans? because i think i hear a lot of libs saying self-identification and self-declaration does indeed make someone trans.
i noticed that the lawyer backed off and would only say "i would respect that person's pronouns," which is a massive retreat, right? |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:09 PM Author: Concupiscible milk It's one thing if the self-identification is genuine and the person has the mental capacity to understand what they are saying. It's quite another situation if the kid is saying something as a joke or off the cuff (Alito's scenario). The school district would have the right to evaluate the child to determine whether the identification is genuine and how it should proceed. Alito is ignoring the nuance to get in his fox news soundbite. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586599) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:15 PM Author: Razzmatazz locale mental disorder "It's quite another situation if the kid is saying something as a joke or off the cuff (Alito's scenario)."
i didn't interpret it that way at all. i read it the opposite. he said the person "sincerely believes" he is a woman. |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:15 PM Author: Learning disabled jet-lagged double fault plaza how the hell are we supposed to tell what's geniuine? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586616) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:18 PM Author: Razzmatazz locale mental disorder it's self-declaration and self-identification alone, according to libs.
btw, he was misreading Alito on this point. Alito accepted that the student's belief that he was a woman was "sincere." |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:41 PM Author: sepia stimulating public bath it’s amazing watching some dishonest and retarded lib trying to deny that they want self-identification, in real time right, right in this thread (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586692) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:42 PM Author: Razzmatazz locale mental disorder listen to the lawyer backpedal and weave:
https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2011157362002763905 |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 5:28 PM Author: sepia stimulating public bath wow (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586925) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:44 PM Author: ebony swashbuckling church building you literally fart cum from your asshole (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586703) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 11:02 AM Author: Sooty home partner > are you rejecting the self-identification standard for trans?
I'm rejecting the standard for believing someone is "just trust me bro." I've never agreed with this position with the shittiest of shitlibs.
Of course the real solution here is to make stalls all unisex and not have those pedotile gaps around the doors and big rape gap underneath that was only ever invented so chomos could chomo.
Then make all sinks communal. That reduces the size requirements of bathrooms considerably.
This is literally only a problem in shiTTTy amerikkka, even third world countries like germany do this right |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 6:50 AM Author: Learning disabled jet-lagged double fault plaza this is a shitty option. i am a subscriber to the Folger Theatre in DC (pause. no homo), and they did a massive renovation a couple years ago. they now have two bathrooms and they are both unisex. all stalls, all floor to ceiling doors and walls, which is good, but it's just fucking weird and jarring walking into the bathroom behind a woman or holding the door for a woman. i can't get used to it.
stop all this faggot lib shit, how about that. mens rooms (for people with a penis), womens rooms (no penis, including people who have chopped their dick off and grown tits, i guess because i don;t really want to see that in my bathroom) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:48 PM Author: thirsty massive pocket flask nowag who determines who is and isn't trans? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586549) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:00 PM Author: razzle lettuce abode some of us are turds too (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586576) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:04 PM Author: Concupiscible milk I guess alito is trying to say the definitions are too amorphous to mean anything but he doesn't conclude the exchange that way. Just comical cable news gotcha shit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586583) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 11:06 AM Author: red flickering corner fanboi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49591382) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:42 PM Author: umber buck-toothed friendly grandma brunch "No one making these policies, and no one who fights against these policies, thinks that a boy saying "lol i'm trans now" makes them trans." you lying piece of shit |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:13 PM Author: Learning disabled jet-lagged double fault plaza libs? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586453) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:21 PM Author: 180 crackhouse sex offender How is this a con law question? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586467) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 5:24 PM Author: burgundy whorehouse foreskin it shouldn't be, unless you want to create a constitutional right for a transgender youth to participate in high school sports consistent with their gender identity (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586916) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 2:58 PM Author: chrome lascivious gunner state Rate this XO poaster from the DOJ trying to humor her
https://x.com/teamtrump47/status/2011108981549490230?s=46 |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:35 PM Author: glittery heaven (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586678) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 3:39 PM Author: sepia stimulating public bath mods, please (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586684) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 4:58 PM Author: lime address fortuitous meteor Disappointed in Tommy for helping her (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586843) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 5:25 PM Author: 180 crackhouse sex offender Is he arguing that schools are being unfair to women? Is that how this wound up at SCOTUS? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49586918) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 11:05 AM Author: red flickering corner fanboi He’s become such a foxnews boomer cuck, it’s sad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49591380) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 11:08 AM Author: Mind-boggling Free-loading Stag Film All of this shit is so retarded. There shouldn't even be an argument about this crap. There is no such thing as a tranny. It's fucking mental illness wherein the "tranny" demands that the entire world play along with their delusion.
It is very obviously a symptom of a much deeper underlying problem and should be treated as such. Instead, libs seem to think that we need to give each and every one of these "transpeople" their own personal Shutter Island experience 24/7.
And the GOP doesn't help when they frame the issue as "keep men out of women's sports." It's pathetic cuck faggot bullshit that gives all of the framing power to the most mentally ill people in the world. |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 11:49 AM Author: red flickering corner fanboi (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49591496) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 12:33 PM Author: umber buck-toothed friendly grandma brunch excellent post (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49591610) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 1:23 PM Author: White exhilarant useless brakes obviously women’s sports is a minor sidebar of the overall issue, but i don’t see how it’s a mistake for the gop to use it. the issue affects people’s kids (which is where a lot of left-leaning people are willing to draw a line in the sand), is easily understandable, and forces shitlibs to take the most facially absurd positions that are in direct opposition to the sizable majority’s views. i don’t think cons are required to cede any suppositional territory to beat libs over the head about this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49591733) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 4:54 PM Author: Mind-boggling Free-loading Stag Film "but i don’t see how it’s a mistake for the gop to use it."
My beef is that that the GOP doesn't attack the underlying premise itself. The GOP's tactics tacitly give credibility to the idea of "trans" to begin with. What needs to happen is a non-stop brutal attack on the idea that someone can be "trans" to begin with.
The reality is that it is incredibly simple to attack the trans concept because it has no merit whatsoever. And the amount of damage it does to society is directly related to its obvious absurdity. It is no different in concept from anorexia ("I'm so fat, I can't eat food anymore, I need to lose weight and be thin") -- and we aren't running around talking about "Anorexic Rights are Human Rights." Obviously both issues stem from deeper underlying issues (and are absolutely influenced by increasingly unnatural external factors.)
The fact that people are supposed to sit around pretending that some dude named Brian is really Brianna (and "always has been") because "they" said they "feel like a woman" is beyond the pale. And people who know better are such fucking cowards that they don't just say:
"YOU CANNOT EVEN DESCRIBE WHAT IT FEELS LIKE TO BE YOU, LET ALONE WHAT IT COULD POSSIBLY FEEL LIKE TO BE SOMEONE ELSE. NO ONE CAN DO THIS. ANY DESCRIPTION OF HOW YOU FEEL IS NEBULOUS AND IMPOSSIBLE TO PUT INTO WORDS THAT MEAN ANYTHING CONCRETE. AT BEST YOU CAN DESCRIBE YOUR EMOTIONAL STATE, BUT TO EVEN DESCRIBE HOW YOU ARE A MAN OR WOMAN IN A REAL AND PROVABLE WAY INCLUDES A DESCRIPTION OF YOUR GENITALS AND CHROMOSOMES. FUCK YOU."
Mind you, "trans" advocates argue extensively that gender roles aren't real *but then lean on gender role descriptions to show how someone is trans.*
I understand how people, perhaps like you, argue "well, the average midwit normie isn't able to handle reality and this helps get them comfortable with pushing back on a problematic issue." But it's wrong in this case. This actually does far more to normalize "trans" bullshit than not talking about the issue at all. Because this basically says "no, no you can do this if you're an adult, just don't play in my kid's sports." LOL wtf are you shitting me with this?
This is being argued in the Supreme Court and well meaning people are going to be sitting around their dinner tables talking about the merits of the arguments when there shouldn't even be a case to begin with! No fucking way James Madison would've been pushing for the judicial branch had he foreseen anything even remotely approaching this insanity.
At the end of both sides' arguments, a reanimated Pol Pot should've entered the room and taken care of both sides with total brutality. |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 5:01 PM Author: White exhilarant useless brakes i appreciate the response and see your point. still, as i indicated at the end of my poast, i think you can take a definitive stance on the issue with a simple “boys shouldn’t play in girls’ sports leagues” without even acknowledging the framing of “trans” as a valid category. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49592325) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 5:18 PM Author: Mind-boggling Free-loading Stag Film I'm sorry, but not with these fucking people who act in bad faith constantly. The existence of this argument (in the Supreme Court) alone will be used by "trans" advocates as a cudgel that "trans" is real. It just gives them ammo to say that we mostly disagree on the details. The underlying premise of this issue -- and all of the other shitlib issues -- must be attacked and deconstructed or there is no winning. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49592371) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 5:11 PM Author: Spruce brethren locus Exactly-- I use the anorexia example all the time. What happened to that "disease"? You hardly hear about it any more. This trannie stuff too will pass. Of course, the delusional we will always have with us, but at least we won't be giving them a soapbox and trumpeting their "reality" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49592345) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 5:22 PM Author: Mind-boggling Free-loading Stag Film The only comeback "they" ever have for the anorexia thing is "well, anorexia can hurt you!" As though genital mutilation and pumping oneself full of hormones won't. And typically the people making this counter "argument" wouldn't ever in their lives eat a non-organic vegetable.
The bigger issue, and why I am always willing to die on this hill, is that many states have codified the shit into law. This isn't just some delusional people that we have to be nice to (I think most people could actually tolerate the rare person who wants to cross-dress), it's insane people forcing everyone to play pretend or face legal consequences. |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 9:54 PM Author: umber buck-toothed friendly grandma brunch "(I think most people could actually tolerate the rare person who wants to cross-dress)" those are the original trannies--transvestites they were weird i always assumed they were a subset of homos, the drag queens i don't know when they disappeared and became transsexuals. i think it was at the beginning of blm when they had trannies on their list of goals, as if being black and being a tranny were partners in victimhood. that would be around trayvon. i don't know if that is really when it began, but that's when i noticed |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 11:38 AM Author: Mind-boggling Free-loading Stag Film Fucking lol yes. If you watch really old Law & Order type police procedural shows, transvestites would pop up here and there and would always be hanging around street hookers (or be street hookers themselves) and crack houses and the like. They were just another part of the seedy underworld. Not some empowered bullshit.
Mass smartphone proliferation is the answer for what happened here, as it is for most other major social problems. |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 2:57 PM Author: umber buck-toothed friendly grandma brunch the other touchstone is the proliferation of tranny bathrooms "4. 2012–2016: Major expansion in schools and workplaces This is when the issue became nationally visible. Important milestones
2012: The EEOC ruled that denying restroom access to a transgender employee could be sex discrimination (Macy v. DOJ). [ihs.gov] 2015: EEOC reinforced that forcing transgender employees into separate bathrooms was discriminatory. 2016:
The Obama administration issued guidance stating that schools receiving federal funds must allow students to use bathrooms consistent with their gender identity. Numerous states and cities passed laws requiring single‑user restrooms to be labeled gender‑neutral (e.g., California’s Equal Restroom Access Act). [lawshun.com]
🚩 This period also triggered the rise of so‑called “bathroom bills”, both for and against transgender access." |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 4:04 PM Author: Mind-boggling Free-loading Stag Film The Obama admin did some unspeakably awful things. Meanwhile, Barry was just counting down the days until he got to hang out full time with David Geffen on his yacht as another one of his rentboys.
Anytime some faggot says "I just miss Obama, he was so well spoken" this crap needs to be shoved down their throats. So much of this shit is why Trump got into office. |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 10:18 AM Author: sepia stimulating public bath (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49593522) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 2:02 PM Author: glittery heaven cr
the libs are winning whenever we have to “debate” basic truths |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 4:58 PM Author: Mind-boggling Free-loading Stag Film Exactly. Libs got power because they endlessly deconstructed societal norms. And then they replaced them with a series of fucking funhouse mirrors. The only way to push back is to endlessly deconstruct their "norms" and replace them with what works.
What gives me hope is that this is what is actually going on right now in a big way. You cannot go on YouTube or whatever without seeing lib bullshit being assaulted with terminal intensity. Someone like Asmongold alone does worlds of good in this way. And there are so many others. |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 6:00 PM Author: glittery heaven no, the only way to win is to not play at all (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49592460) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 11:45 AM Author: Mind-boggling Free-loading Stag Film Too many status conscious "thoughtful moderates" will tolerate this crap. I am fine with an attitude of total dismissal of the bullshit, but I think it has to be done in concert with aggressive deconstruction. In many ways, it's giving permission to normal people to feel confident that they are sane and should not put up with bullshit. As obvious as these arguments seem, I've found that a lot of smart normie types just don't think in this way because of the amount of social conditioning they've undergone (directly or indirectly.)
In essence, we need a pincer movement to destroy shitlib crap. |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 3:07 PM Author: glittery heaven as in the military, people with “excess” courage inspire others to be braver (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49594406) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 10:17 AM Author: sepia stimulating public bath (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49593520) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 1:21 PM Author: 180 crackhouse sex offender Do cons expect to win this case? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49591723) |
|
Date: January 15th, 2026 1:51 PM Author: trip macaca I thought we were done with all this woke tranny crap. Trump won. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49591815) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 8:50 AM Author: 180 crackhouse sex offender Do cons expect to win this case? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49593400) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 11:40 AM Author: Razzmatazz locale mental disorder yeah (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49593759) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 12:56 PM Author: burgundy whorehouse foreskin yeah it's tough to see how the numbers would change from the last case which was 6-3. i'll be interested to see how kagan votes though
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-477_2cp3.pdf |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 1:17 PM Author: 180 crackhouse sex offender Really? You can't find any difference between these cases? lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49594036) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 1:15 PM Author: 180 crackhouse sex offender Only pumos believe this? lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49594031) |
|
Date: January 16th, 2026 3:12 PM Author: 180 crackhouse sex offender Cons do you still expect to win this case? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821545&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310481#49594415) |