art valuation experts get itt
| bateful persian | 12/04/25 | | Spectacular Hideous Skinny Woman | 12/04/25 | | bateful persian | 12/04/25 | | Spectacular Hideous Skinny Woman | 12/04/25 | | Insane shrine faggotry | 12/04/25 | | bateful persian | 12/04/25 | | coral friendly grandma clown | 12/04/25 | | insecure odious circlehead hospital | 12/04/25 | | bateful persian | 12/04/25 | | Hairraiser peach lodge | 12/04/25 | | bateful persian | 12/04/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 4th, 2025 9:15 AM Author: bateful persian
what's generally considered more valuable
- an original work of a famous person/artist?
- a famous person/artist doing their own replica of highly famous painting?
does signed / unsigned matter assuming the piece comes with authentication?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806066&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486",#49482715) |
Date: December 4th, 2025 6:38 PM Author: bateful persian
shows how stupid this board is when it comes to arttt
the van gogh replica went for 8k+ and the matisse rep went for 17k+
lol, the 1990's seiko quartz diver went for 21k+
i consider winning my lot of 3 nm landscapes (1 signed) for $4.3k all in with hammer fees to be a steal.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806066&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486",#49484333) |
|
|