fiercer war: '90s console wars or current smartphone wars?
| blathering 180 sanctuary | 10/26/12 | | exhilarant haunted graveyard | 10/26/12 | | excitant nowag | 10/26/12 | | Vermilion Impertinent Knife | 10/26/12 | | Mildly autistic carmine hall | 10/26/12 | | smoky irradiated main people | 10/26/12 | | titillating umber parlor | 10/26/12 | | canary misunderstood trump supporter | 10/26/12 | | Unholy address pistol | 10/26/12 | | Peter Brady | 05/17/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 26th, 2012 7:00 AM Author: canary misunderstood trump supporter
Penis
/thread
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2092651&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#21889882) |
Date: October 26th, 2012 7:36 AM Author: Unholy address pistol
From the perspective of consumer engagement, the console wars were unrivaled. Back then, it was rare to have two consoles, and I remember kids arguing endlessly over the merits of each.
No one really cares about the differences between an iPhone and a Galaxy. One reason is that you don't really have to pay the full cost of your phone, and another is that these things get replaced about every year or two, unlike consoles which were a 5 year investment.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2092651&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#21889909) |
|
|