The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
I wonder how the F35s will fair if we attack Iran
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 20th, 2019 4:33 PM Author: Tan Deep Jewess Brethren I'm prepared to be disappointed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#38416981) |
Date: June 20th, 2019 4:35 PM Author: frisky spectacular corner Zero. They'll just use standoff weapons. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#38416994) |
 |
Date: June 20th, 2019 4:50 PM Author: Tan Deep Jewess Brethren When do you think they will ever be used? I'm skeptical that they're even effective. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#38417044) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2019 4:53 PM Author: Territorial Foreskin Depends on what you mean by effective.
They are just stealthy flying platforms for the best radars known to man. The speed, maneuverability or even range of an aircraft doesn't matter when you can fire a missile at a target before the enemy even knows you're there. |
|
Date: June 20th, 2019 5:00 PM Author: Tan Deep Jewess Brethren Maybe what I meant to say was I expect some embarrassing technical defect. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#38417103) |
|
Date: June 20th, 2019 5:02 PM Author: flesh excitant national security agency set Military gets around that problem by flying them with half their features disabled. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#38417109) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 8:53 AM Author: Territorial Foreskin I think we know all of its flaws by now. It's easily the most scrutinized product ever designed at this point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#38419775) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 8:58 AM Author: dun slippery resort The Pentagon is battling the clock to fix serious, unreported F-35 ... DefenseNews.com-Jun 12, 2019 WASHINGTON — Over the past several years, U.S. Defense Department leaders have gone from citing technical problems as their biggest ... |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 9:06 AM Author: Territorial Foreskin When I said "we" I meant the US military. Of course they're not going to tell us about all of the fighter's limitations. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#38419796) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 9:09 AM Author: dun slippery resort It's easily the most scrutinized product ever designed at this point.
Looked like you implied the Pentagon had already figured its flaws. |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 9:20 AM Author: Territorial Foreskin Oh definitely not.
It's an inherently flawed plane. The moment they tried to take one design and make an carrier capable fighter, a VTOL fighter and a standard air superiority fighter it was doomed. |
|
Date: June 24th, 2019 12:55 AM Author: flesh excitant national security agency set https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/f-35-flaw-even-fixable-63797 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#38430995) |
|
Date: June 21st, 2019 9:10 AM Author: boyish trailer park *ahem*
“fare” |
|
Date: March 1st, 2026 5:18 AM Author: incel adams Pretty well turns out (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49704512) |
|
Date: March 1st, 2026 5:29 AM Author: fatty nigger (✅🍑) Huh. Yeah. Turns out the stealth thing is not a ruse. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4286833&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49704515) |