\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Is it possible for Trump to gracefully restore traditional alliances?

Can he save face and pivot away from Russia/Putin and restor...
Tan misanthropic goyim
  05/01/25
we never had any alliances. those countries were freeriding ...
Heady Rambunctious Orchestra Pit Friendly Grandma
  05/01/25
whoa crrr
sadistic razzle-dazzle dragon
  05/01/25
russia was literally our ally out of necessity in ww2, the &...
Heady Rambunctious Orchestra Pit Friendly Grandma
  05/01/25
Cr cuz Trump said so and Trump simply doesn't lie
Buff Excitant People Who Are Hurt
  05/01/25
No because the EU refuses to fund its own defense and expect...
cerebral roommate cumskin
  05/01/25
They should rearm for their own benefit, I agree, but I can ...
Buff Excitant People Who Are Hurt
  05/01/25
i think his point is that we dont want to have to spend it o...
Heady Rambunctious Orchestra Pit Friendly Grandma
  05/01/25
If we're spending that much, and our NATO allies want us to ...
Tan misanthropic goyim
  05/01/25
Who says they want us to keep spending that much?
Buff Excitant People Who Are Hurt
  05/01/25
...
useless mother
  05/01/25
No - slavery to Israel forbids that
Glittery hairless menage chad
  05/01/25
Letting Europe freeload off us again would be bad.
cerebral roommate cumskin
  05/01/25
No he has to be replaced for those alliances to be restored
Henna blathering hospital digit ratio
  05/01/25
When I think of Trump, gracefulness is the first attribute t...
Spruce Deer Antler
  05/01/25
i'm sure they would jump at the chance to reenter the one wa...
useless mother
  05/01/25
Not really but its funny EU/Canada/AUS etc arent just teamin...
federal institution sex offender
  05/01/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 8:26 AM
Author: Tan misanthropic goyim

Can he save face and pivot away from Russia/Putin and restore our military and economic alliances with the EU and Canada?

A victory he could claim is getting our NATO partners to wake up, spend more on defense and pull their weight in this partnership ultimately strengthening our influence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895745)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 8:31 AM
Author: Heady Rambunctious Orchestra Pit Friendly Grandma

we never had any alliances. those countries were freeriding the whole time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895757)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 8:33 AM
Author: sadistic razzle-dazzle dragon

whoa crrr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895759)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 8:37 AM
Author: Heady Rambunctious Orchestra Pit Friendly Grandma

russia was literally our ally out of necessity in ww2, the "greatest war of all time" memorialized in thousands of movies and books during the second half of the 20th century and were *still* supposed to believe putin is a boogyman despite the fact that hes run russia for two decades and never attacked us because of vague economic concerns by various insiders who stand to lose money if american does not fight a geopolitical war or a hot war against them. also the uk/britain/england/whatever you call it: eyyy there mate can ye spunk in me mum?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895768)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 8:37 AM
Author: Buff Excitant People Who Are Hurt

Cr cuz Trump said so and Trump simply doesn't lie

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895766)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 8:59 AM
Author: cerebral roommate cumskin

No because the EU refuses to fund its own defense and expects American to bear the cost even though it regularly acts against our interest in international affairs. Even Obama had the same stance. If Europe won't pay then they don't get our help, simple as that. Alternatively, they can act like true vassals and then relying on us for defense would be less egregious.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895830)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 9:13 AM
Author: Buff Excitant People Who Are Hurt

They should rearm for their own benefit, I agree, but I can also understand why they don't want to spend 3%+ of their GDP on military. The whole point of a broad military alliance is to get higher security for lower cost, not to get into a spending contest with your allies. The global average spend on military is 2.5% but the US spends like 3.4% of its massive GDP and wants NATO countries to spend the same. Chief rival "China" only spends 1.7%. The US should probably spend less on military and trim down the massive debt.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895869)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 9:18 AM
Author: Heady Rambunctious Orchestra Pit Friendly Grandma

i think his point is that we dont want to have to spend it on their behalf anymore

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895884)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 10:09 AM
Author: Tan misanthropic goyim

If we're spending that much, and our NATO allies want us to keep spending that much, then they should do the same, as they benefit from the protection and stability our massive military creates for them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895995)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 10:24 AM
Author: Buff Excitant People Who Are Hurt

Who says they want us to keep spending that much?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48896033)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 10:26 AM
Author: useless mother



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48896035)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 8:55 AM
Author: Glittery hairless menage chad

No - slavery to Israel forbids that

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895820)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 8:58 AM
Author: cerebral roommate cumskin

Letting Europe freeload off us again would be bad.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895827)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 9:01 AM
Author: Henna blathering hospital digit ratio

No he has to be replaced for those alliances to be restored

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895835)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 9:29 AM
Author: Spruce Deer Antler

When I think of Trump, gracefulness is the first attribute that comes to mind.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48895908)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 10:27 AM
Author: useless mother

i'm sure they would jump at the chance to reenter the one way alliances and deals that benefited them at our expense.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48896040)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 1st, 2025 10:28 AM
Author: federal institution sex offender

Not really but its funny EU/Canada/AUS etc arent just teaming up and openly saying its over. This is because the faggots are on the CIA payroll, have tons of US military equipmenet and own tons of USD and bonds. Its not that easy, they also think they can just wait for Dems to regain power in less than 4 years

If they wanted to truly furk the US they cld have, just sell their bonds and boycott US. But they didnt cause they are beta fags

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5719118&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48896042)