The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| mildly autistic locus | 01/06/26 | | vigorous home | 01/06/26 | | heady digit ratio | 01/06/26 | | vigorous home | 01/06/26 | | heady digit ratio | 01/06/26 | | vigorous home | 01/06/26 | | mildly autistic locus | 01/06/26 | | vigorous home | 01/06/26 | | mildly autistic locus | 01/06/26 | | Angry Multi-colored Circlehead Native | 01/07/26 | | autistic boyish dysfunction stead | 01/06/26 | | trip navy resort | 01/06/26 | | heady digit ratio | 01/06/26 | | milky dashing love of her life | 01/06/26 | | heady digit ratio | 01/06/26 | | dull skinny woman | 01/06/26 | | Cerebral Deer Antler Windowlicker | 01/06/26 | | Transparent duck-like wagecucks | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: vigorous home
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49568134) |
|
|