\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Is it too rude to call the opposing side's argument "silly" in a brief?

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but th...
orange irradiated bawdyhouse
  12/06/25
I wouldn't.
federal bonkers rigpig
  12/06/25
great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really&quo...
odious cordovan chapel
  12/06/25
Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"
federal bonkers rigpig
  12/06/25
...
ungodly rebellious nibblets site
  12/06/25
pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and y...
Charismatic area
  12/06/25
People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge to...
orange irradiated bawdyhouse
  12/06/25
bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including ...
Charismatic area
  12/06/25
...
know-it-all fortuitous meteor dilemma
  12/06/25
...
know-it-all fortuitous meteor dilemma
  12/06/25
use "unserious" instead
magenta sadistic stag film boiling water
  12/06/25
could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs
odious cordovan chapel
  12/06/25
Nonsensical
federal bonkers rigpig
  12/06/25
"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"
Curious circlehead legend
  12/06/25
"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g...
Charismatic area
  12/06/25
"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh w...
Curious circlehead legend
  12/06/25
that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. b...
Charismatic area
  12/07/25
Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no be...
Curious circlehead legend
  12/07/25
Seems cheap
Disturbing white den
  12/06/25
wacky
Drab Awkward Puppy Theatre
  12/06/25
finna make shiz up
federal bonkers rigpig
  12/06/25
“trooned out”
Charcoal provocative hunting ground ticket booth
  12/06/25
frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specio...
zippy internal respiration stage
  12/06/25
the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr
Charismatic area
  12/06/25
Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat ou...
orange irradiated bawdyhouse
  12/06/25
Drop a few "Not so."s.
saffron costumed candlestick maker giraffe
  12/06/25
"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."
Exhilarant hyperactive sweet tailpipe
  12/06/25
...
orange irradiated bawdyhouse
  12/06/25
"nigger"
spruce misunderstood resort gay wizard
  12/07/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:29 PM
Author: orange irradiated bawdyhouse

It is silly. I would say it is retarded or brain dead but that seems clearly over the line.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488467)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:32 PM
Author: federal bonkers rigpig

I wouldn't.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488479)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:34 PM
Author: odious cordovan chapel

great idea, but also quanitfy it with maybe "really" silly, or perhaps "super" silly so they dont get confused.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488493)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: federal bonkers rigpig

Maybe go so far as to call it "gay"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488503)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:46 PM
Author: ungodly rebellious nibblets site



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488525)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:37 PM
Author: Charismatic area

pejoratives only make your own arguments appear weaker and you look worse to the court.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488501)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:47 PM
Author: orange irradiated bawdyhouse

People say ridiculous all the time. How is silly a bridge too far.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488531)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:56 PM
Author: Charismatic area

bad lawyers do. i'm talking about all pejoratives including "ridiculous."

there is no advantage to doing this. if the argument is ridiculous the court won't have to be told that. if they agree with you your use will either have a neutral or negative impression. so there's no advantage.

tcr instead of just saying "it's silly" is to highlight its silliness instead of just saying it outright. there are plenty of ways you can shit on OC's arguments without just saying "they're silly." if it truly is silly this shouldn't be difficult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488562)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:20 PM
Author: know-it-all fortuitous meteor dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488652)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: know-it-all fortuitous meteor dilemma



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488646)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:48 PM
Author: magenta sadistic stag film boiling water

use "unserious" instead

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488536)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:55 PM
Author: odious cordovan chapel

could also use 'baseless'. This is one of my favs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488556)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 12:58 PM
Author: federal bonkers rigpig

Nonsensical

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488565)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:02 PM
Author: Curious circlehead legend

"meritless, baseless, and nonsensical"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489724)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:00 PM
Author: Charismatic area

"X argument is not supported by the law" (see, e.g. fundamental case that every idiot knows).

recently ACB cited marbury when addressing a KTJ dissent that was absolutely ruthless. that's far more effective and devasting than saying "KTJ's dissent is silly." don't say it's silly, show why it's silly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488570)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 8:03 PM
Author: Curious circlehead legend

"not supported by the law" is dumb. always laugh when people say that. it could mean a million things. u saying they got the law wrong? applied the facts to the law wrong? etc.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489727)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: Charismatic area

that's fair, it is a catch-all that isnt very descriptive. but itt we don't know why candy ride thinks OCs argument is silly so a catch-all is appropriate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49491128)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:10 AM
Author: Curious circlehead legend

Because it’s a meaningless catch all, it’s no better than silly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49491145)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:01 PM
Author: Disturbing white den

Seems cheap

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488572)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:17 PM
Author: Drab Awkward Puppy Theatre

wacky

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488636)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:18 PM
Author: federal bonkers rigpig

finna make shiz up

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488642)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:19 PM
Author: Charcoal provocative hunting ground ticket booth

“trooned out”

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488651)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: zippy internal respiration stage

frankly, opposing counsel’s argument is deadass specious, unsupported by precedent or statute, and should be afforded no weight by the court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488669)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 1:25 PM
Author: Charismatic area

the court should low key consider sanctions no cap frfr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49488673)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:23 PM
Author: orange irradiated bawdyhouse

Did I cross the line when I said Plaintiff was "flat out wrong"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489067)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:27 PM
Author: saffron costumed candlestick maker giraffe

Drop a few "Not so."s.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489083)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:28 PM
Author: Exhilarant hyperactive sweet tailpipe

"Opponent's argument is like Tim Walz."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489090)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 6th, 2025 4:33 PM
Author: orange irradiated bawdyhouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49489103)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 7th, 2025 11:26 AM
Author: spruce misunderstood resort gay wizard

"nigger"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5806993&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49491178)