In today's case, it started out with the wife's lawyer instructing her to get a fraudulent TRO to get my guy out of the house and limit his parenting time. This is his MO which I've seen play out dozens of times. I would never do this because it harms a child who has no voice in the litigation.

I'm also taking over a case from a lawyer who billed his client $350k despite never having met her in person even once, taking no depositions, and doing zero trial preparation (trial has not even been scheduled).

The family law practice has more than its fair share of grifters preying on vulnerable people. It is a particularly immoral way to make a living because people are trusting you to guide them through a very difficult personal transition and, as noted above, children's lives are at stake.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49505069)

no, there aren't.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49505124)

Always telling how it doesn’t take much poking to get you to show what an utter piece of shit you are.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49507013)

See how "dupa" immediately drops his cutesy schtick and mocks me for being a child of divorce, which I'm not but if I were it would probably be hurtful. it's like mocking a guy in a wheelchair while defending/profiting off the drunk driver who put him in one.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49510747)

no one is a "fan" of divorce you psycho. are you irate at family law judges too? you're acting like a deranged shitlib that blames cops for crimes. divorces are going to happen and in something that contentious lawyers are going to get hired.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49510751)

that doesn't have to be the case. maybe I am a shitlib on this, but for profit divorce law doesn't need to/probably shouldn't exist. judges are employees of the state and are supposed to be neutral, even if a lot of times they aren't.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49510759)

how could this possibly be done in cases involving large estates, child custody, etc? dealing with divorcing people is often insanely stressful because of how contentious it is, and you want to put the entire matter in a single state employee's hands? and how could you *BAN* these people from hiring representation?

this is perhaps the dumbest suggestion i've ever heard. it's not even a "shitlib" thing, it's just really fucking dumb.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49510775)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49511065)

"that wouldn't work"

"we should eliminate divorce entirely"

no, it's not responsive. it would be like if we were discussing a tax and you shifted to "we should eliminate taxes entirely."

anyway this is completely retarded and i'm sorry your wife left you but banning divorce isn't going to change that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49511147)

now you're just projecting

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49511182)

Same how you make threads gloating about how much better at soccer your kids are than other poasters kids. there probably are ppl here who have kids with disabilities and take stuff like that as a real punch in the gut. mocking you for raising some black guy's kids is fair game because it's a choice you willingly made vs. mocking someone for things outside of their control. the latter is what makes you a piece of shit. also the whole divorce law thing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49511739)

over/under - how many teenage girls do you think have been raped by the "new boyfriends" of the married mothers bloodacre manipulated into ruining their children's family? 200? 500? more than that? he is good at what he does and has been at this for some time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49512052)

I don’t have affairs.

My soccer dad posting is obvious schtick. You’re just dumb and emotional.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49512262)

creeping on girls you flirt with on the internet is cheating by a lot of women's standards. maybe it's fine in eurasia, but women from the first world generally aren't cool with it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49515719)

In this scenario, you think I’m the bad actor?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49516369)

edit: but how many times have you been on the other side? how many times have you kept a father (or less likely, a mother) from his child based on the lies of your client? my sense is you're more mercenary than saint.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49512056)

Everyone in my practice seems to hate my guts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5809580&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#49516372)