\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wow this is all AI? Realtalk Pornstars are going to be out of work soon

May be a misleading thread title for the link but the point ...
internet g0y
  05/21/25
yeah i'm trying to tell people that we won't even make it to...
nancy mace's rapist
  05/21/25
It’s not like cinema where many people will be against...
internet g0y
  05/21/25
I think even with cinema the resistance would quickly fade w...
.,.,,..,..,.,..:,,:,...,:::,.,.,:,.,.:.,:.,:.::,.
  05/21/25
the big AI corps won't touch it. there will be egregious gua...
nancy mace's rapist
  05/21/25
I need to know there's a real girl being degraded and put in...
the walter white of this generation (walt jr.)
  05/21/25
Happy Zukot or whatever satanic holiday you and your ilk are...
martin heidegger
  05/22/25
People keep saying that, but I haven't seen a single decent ...
,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
  05/21/25
video generation models are very computationally expensive t...
,.,.,,,,,,,..,.,.,.,.,,.,.,
  05/22/25
https://www.tiktok.com/@hashem.alghaili/video/75070428262077...
lsd
  05/21/25
Nice. Then there must be some kind of ban on porn from the g...
,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................
  05/22/25
There is. Google Gemini won't even generate real people face...
Greetings
  05/22/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 21st, 2025 11:33 PM
Author: internet g0y

May be a misleading thread title for the link but the point is that if everything in this vid is really AI then what use is there for actual porn starlets anymore presumably that will all be AI soon

https://x.com/laszlogaal_/status/1925094336200573225

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952570)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 21st, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: nancy mace's rapist

yeah i'm trying to tell people that we won't even make it to sex robots. nobody wants to fuck a robot. people are just going to endlessly jerk off to crisper-than-irl AI generated porn of every fantasy they can come up with while their AI gfs whisper and moan in their ears

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952578)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 21st, 2025 11:46 PM
Author: internet g0y

It’s not like cinema where many people will be against watching AI only stuff I would expect it to quickly supplant real porn

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952594)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 21st, 2025 11:49 PM
Author: .,.,,..,..,.,..:,,:,...,:::,.,.,:,.,.:.,:.,:.::,.


I think even with cinema the resistance would quickly fade when they realize this will allow many more movies that aren’t GC capeshit. The production costs prevent studios from taking financial risks. If production costs are significantly smaller, we should see a greater variety of films.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952600)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 21st, 2025 11:52 PM
Author: nancy mace's rapist

the big AI corps won't touch it. there will be egregious guardrails on porn generation using the frontier models

there's gonna be a huge market of fine-tuning open source models to allow people to goon out

i'm not sure what the big corps will do with AI gfs/bfs. i suspect that they will leave up no-sex guardrails but tacitly leave the companionship agents open to relatively straightforward jailbreaking so that users can sex them up. the competitive pressures will be too overwhelming to do otherwise imo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952604)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 21st, 2025 11:53 PM
Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.)

I need to know there's a real girl being degraded and put in her little whore place in order to cum.

An accurate visualization of a fake 18 year old with an eating disorder having a toilet seat slammed down on her head while getting sodomized from behind is just not going to do it for anyone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952606)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 22nd, 2025 12:31 AM
Author: martin heidegger

Happy Zukot or whatever satanic holiday you and your ilk are celebrating today

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952652)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 21st, 2025 11:53 PM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................


People keep saying that, but I haven't seen a single decent AI porn clip yet. I expect it's coming, but you'd think it would already be here by now. I mean, some poor geek in his basement could make millions, not sure why it hasn't happened yet.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952609)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 22nd, 2025 12:08 AM
Author: ,.,.,,,,,,,..,.,.,.,.,,.,.,


video generation models are very computationally expensive to run, still produce lots of artifacts, require sampling to get decent output and are still pretty new. image models have only become reliably good fairly recently, and video is obviously much more difficult.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952631)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 21st, 2025 11:59 PM
Author: lsd

https://www.tiktok.com/@hashem.alghaili/video/7507042826207776022

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952617)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 22nd, 2025 12:01 AM
Author: ,.,,.,.,,,,,,.....................


Nice. Then there must be some kind of ban on porn from the good AI companies. Otherwise there would be porn videos of that quality.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952619)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 22nd, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: Greetings

There is. Google Gemini won't even generate real people faces, let alone pornography.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728691&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48952674)