https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_writing

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47705957)

so are indians, btw

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706155)

odd case

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47705992)

*literally uses asian alphabets*

*is fucktarded inconsistent xoxo cumskin*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706103)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4696139&forum_id=2#41417120

lol@ your dumb turd ass bro

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706118)

when was the first evidence of writing in northern europe?

Northern Europe adopted writing systems much later than other regions like the Mediterranean. There isn't any evidence of indigenous writing systems developing in the area.

The shift towards writing in Northern Europe happened around the early centuries AD, during the protohistorical period. This is when Germanic tribes began to interact more with Roman culture and adopted their writing systems.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706006)

Compared to the Mediterranean civilizations where writing emerged around 3000-1000 BC (think Egyptians, Minoans), Northern Europe adopted writing systems much later. We're talking roughly around the first few centuries AD.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706012)

There are a few reasons why Northern Europe adopted writing much later than other regions:

Different Needs: Societies in the Mediterranean with complex administration, trade networks, and large-scale agriculture found writing essential for record-keeping, taxation, and communication. Northern European societies, with a focus on smaller, more mobile communities and oral traditions, didn't have the same pressing need for a formal writing system.

Limited Trade: Early writing systems often spread through trade routes. Since Northern Europe wasn't as heavily involved in long-distance trade as the Mediterranean, they weren't exposed to these writing systems as readily.

Oral Traditions: Northerners relied heavily on oral traditions for storytelling, history, and passing down knowledge. This strong tradition might have made the need for a written record less urgent.

Climate & Materials: The colder, wetter climate of Northern Europe makes it harder to preserve writing materials like papyrus (used in Egypt). This could have discouraged the development of a writing system altogether.

The arrival of the Roman Empire and increased interaction with Roman culture in the early centuries AD became a turning point. The Romans used alphabets derived from the Phoenicians, and these alphabets eventually adapted into the runic scripts used by Germanic peoples.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706015)

Lmao @ shitskin insect “people” dedicating entire lives and souls to scribbling down a bunch of inane bullshit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706018)

oh the SAT doesnt matteR!

studying STEM is for nerds!!

chung didnt even snort meth growing up!!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706023)

its hilarous u freaks never can explain WTF did birdshits do pre 1500AD

EVERYONE IS ASKING IN MY INDIAN ARYAN VILLAGE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706346)

THANK

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706362)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47706576)

and yet the English co-invented calculus which basically lifted the world from serfdom to modernity.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47709117)

Bhāskara II was acquainted with some ideas of differential calculus and suggested that the "differential coefficient" vanishes at an extremum value of the function.[15] In his astronomical work, he gave a procedure that looked like a precursor to infinitesimal methods. Namely, if

𝑥

≈

𝑦

{\displaystyle x\approx y} then

sin

⁡

(

𝑦

)

−

sin

⁡

(

𝑥

)

≈

(

𝑦

−

𝑥

)

cos

⁡

(

𝑦

)

.

{\displaystyle \sin(y)-\sin(x)\approx (y-x)\cos(y).} This can be interpreted as the discovery that cosine is the derivative of sine.[16] In the 14th century, Indian mathematicians gave a non-rigorous method, resembling differentiation, applicable to some trigonometric functions. Madhava of Sangamagrama and the Kerala School of Astronomy and Mathematics stated components of calculus

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47709265)

LOLLERCAUSTTT

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47714042)

Literacy then grew slowly but steadily. In the late 1400s 10% of men were literate, climbing to 20% in the 1500s, 30% by 1650, 45% by 1714, and 60% by 1754.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5534817&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#47714472)