The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Just Watched OPPENHEIMER. Thoughts ITT
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 19th, 2024 7:33 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., my main thought: this film was way overproduced/overdirected. they had a very compelling story that could have been made into a 180 film just by letting the story speak for itself, and it didn't need to be told in a mishmash order with 3 hours of constant intense feeling and drama. all this overproduction takes away from how amazing the story is itself, and it's just unnecessary. there's no reason a biopic or whatever you'd call this needs to be filmed like some memento.
that being said, it was a very exciting and engaging movie. the acting and story and raw material was all excellent. it had us on the edge of our seats for the entire 3 hours, and didn't feel too long. it was just too unnecessarily intense the whole time and needed to calm the fuck down at times. boring is good sometimes.
call me gay, but the nudity was trashy and unnecessary for a movie like this. no reason we needed to see that girl's tits out constantly. it all just makes the movie come off as degenerate jew hollywood garbage.
overall, compared to all the shitlib propaganda garbage that hollywood has been making in recent years, this movie has got to be as good as they can possibly do. it's nice to see a movie about scientists with (((white))) men heroes. if hollywood is educating the masses about this story and important piece of history, that's a good thing.
i see why it won all this acclaim given how ttt movies have been lately. but objectively, a movie like this shouldn't be best picture in any era where hollywood was producing good movies on the regular. reviews say this movie is one of the best of the 21st century; that's a sad testament to where hollywood is at now.
the movie did have undertones of hollywood jewish shitlibbery. it was obviously antiweapons and gave sympathy to the classic hollywood commie/shitlib/anti-mccarthyism schtick. but that was the reality of the movie and it told a fair story given the time. |
Date: November 19th, 2024 7:35 AM Author: average/ordinary/typical citizen/person That movie was not exciting (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48355166) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 7:39 AM Author: fury and intensity of a straight up murderer (gunneratttt) super dramatized, to the point it felt like i was watching dr. manhattan's scientist scenes in the watchmen the entire time. really dumb movie. it was just a bunch of nerds doing science. nolan's style is not suited to biopics. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48355172) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 7:53 AM Author: UN peacekeeper your first and second paragraphs seem to be in tension with each other (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48355197) |
 |
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:18 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., It’s called cheap tricks. Something can keep you on the edge of your seat and be exciting but not actually be good cinema. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48355251) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:00 AM Author: 2025 Little Free Library there were poasts a year or so ago about how it showed full dong? i havent seen it and never will but is this true? i agree nudity and sex scenes are highly indicative of hollywood garbage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48355214) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:17 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., There was no full or partial dong. My wife would have noticed even if I didn’t because I was focused on that mediocre girl’s small tits. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48355248) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:03 AM Author: .,.,.,....., in retrospect i hardly remember it and would avoid a second watch
|
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 8:17 AM Author: Chingada Madre There were some tits in that film otherwise meh and last hour was dull af (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48355249) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 10:03 AM Author: ...,,..;...,,..,..,...,,,;.., The tits were meh. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5636680&forum_id=2\u0026mark_id=5310486#48355564) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2024 10:10 AM Author: rogue planet orbiting the SOL tbh i thought it really sucked
but there's some good material in there. some rando will prolly come out with a fan-made AI cut of oppenheimer in the next five years that's an unmitigated 180 |